GMforPowergamers
Legend
I don't want those two...
D&D 5E The Decrease in Desire for Magic in D&D
- Thread starter DND_Reborn
- Start date
dave2008
Legend
You don't want those two or you want them + more options in-between?
Garthanos
Arcadian Knight
that is one more for the list...( it's a significant list of things from 4e that have been ported, from NADs to Epic Destinies to Monster Abilities to Skill Challenges and so on and so forth)
Undrave
Hero
Pfff... nobody ever RUNS AWAY in D&D! That's the coward's way out
Seriously though, he game does NOT train nw players to consider escaping, or even realize when you're outgunned before a fight breaks out, and, a lot of times, even a dash isn't enough to outpace someone willing to strike you down because of how speeds end up. There's a communication issue there.
MichaelSomething
Legend
That sounds like a job for the Empowered DM!Pfff... nobody ever RUNS AWAY in D&D! That's the coward's way out
Seriously though, he game does NOT train nw players to consider escaping, or even realize when you're outgunned before a fight breaks out, and, a lot of times, even a dash isn't enough to outpace someone willing to strike you down because of how speeds end up. There's a communication issue there.
Bill Zebub
“It’s probably Matt Mercer’s fault.”
Wizards are also useful in those situations, by the way: teleport to a high level NPC cleric.
Lanefan
Victoria Rules
If they all run at once, shouldn't the OA either be against a random one or against whichever one the PC's player chooses, depending how the DM wants to run it?
Lanefan
Victoria Rules
A mage and a martial were hit in my recently-played example; we didn't know what the "statue" actually was and it got in among us.
DND_Reborn
The High Aldwin
If they all moved at once, I would allow the player to choose which to go after, personally.
However, if all four are bugbears, which would likely be pretty much identical anyway, random works, too.
FrozenNorth
Hero
He isn’t focussed on all 4. He just took a swipe at Bugbear A with his AoO. Since combat is simultaneous, he attacked 1 while the other 3 pushed them past him.
To me, the fact the cleric took the Dodge Action is irrelevant. Would you also consider it cheesy if the Cleric attack A, B tried toslip past and got hit with an AoO, then A, C and D moved past him? If not, what is the difference with your scenario?
What about the common scenario I see in play? One PC deliberately triggers an AoO so weaker PCs can withdraw without being downed?
Edit. I see you use a different initiative system. However, my point is that under the default system, an AoO represents something observable in the fiction, and can be leveraged by the PCs.
Garthanos
Arcadian Knight
The idea the highly skilled combatants can only react to one but can make 4 attacks on their arbitrary time slot (even though the action is supposedly simultaneous) is kind of nonsensical.
For one thing presumably these reactions are exploiting special openings and are easier than the other attacks....
Last edited:
GMforPowergamers
Legend
I can somewhat understand the 'I want a high level caster to wave a magic wand and it goes away" but I really don't. I also don't want "we have to search out a high level cleric or have this be permanent"
What I want is in world, if the highest cleric we know is 5th level* we can take some time (between a weekend and a full tenday) and be back up. I also want skilled non casters to have access to this.
*5th isnt pulled out of my butt it is a pattern i have seen with newish DMs in 2e and 5e where all non bad guys cap around 5th or 6th... including 1995 me.
Garthanos
Arcadian Knight
Characters should have to make some coordinated rush maneuver (possibly guided by a leader) involving all of them being truly simultaneous instead of stretched out over the 6 seconds based on their initiative... ie to restrict the combatants response to a limited number of opportunity attacks. It should take some effort and group coordination unless the dice simply say he missed (which would mean an accidental coordination).
This is one example of what a Warlord is for planning/triggering that dynamically and an example of why the Battlemaster does not feel like one.
Undrave
Hero
Empowered DM? What kind of new buzzword is that? Feels like a fancy term for railroading DM
You know, this talk about running away brought to mind the Battlemaster's ability to judge if someone is stronger or weaker than them at certain thing. The 'Know your Enemy' feature, which goes like this:
I think that should be a base Fighter ability. They can just LOOK at a guy and say 'Yeah I can take him' or 'Oh snap we better not mess with that dude!'. An the number of things you can ask the DM should be equal to your Prof. bonus so you get better at it with time.
There’s a fantastic scene in the first season of Thunderbolt Fantasy where the hero, who is new to the country in the show and thus don’t know anyone’s reputation, goes to try and peacefully settle a dispute with a man known as the Screaming Phoenix Killer. He joins him for a drink at a table (the establishment cleared due to the Screaming Phoenix Killer’s reputation as a merciless swordsman) and they have a sort of amicable talk about their philosophy. Near the end, Screaming Phoenix Killer accuses the hero of being hypocritical about wanting peace and not being willing to fight: he’s been on the defensive since the start. Killer reveals he’s been thinking about cutting him down since the moment the hero sat down, but despite his nonchalant look, he could tell the hero’s defense was ironclad. We then see a montage from Killer’s mind where he imagines a bunch of ways to quickly strike and each time the hero parries the assault with ease.
" “Battle starts when swords are drawn”, only a fool thinks this way. "
I want THAT as a core feature of the Fighter!
That makes sense, it's the tough guy distracting the bad guy so his friend can slip away.
Last edited:
Vaalingrade
Legend
It does sound like the 'DM is God', 'my way or the highway', 'player agency is a threat to my sovereignty' machismo machine I have no intention to play with ever again.Empowered DM? What kind of new buzzword is that? Feels like a fancy term for railroading DM
You could always play the game as it was originally intended and that was with three levels. The only reason they added more levels was because of AD&D.
Most young people today don't realize that D&D in it's current form is still the Advanced version which is why there is bell curve to comprehend and retain the rules and mechanics to some extent.
Anyway it's probably too late to do these kinds of restrictions, since video games enable you to play godlike characters and real gods.
Most young people today don't realize that D&D in it's current form is still the Advanced version which is why there is bell curve to comprehend and retain the rules and mechanics to some extent.
Anyway it's probably too late to do these kinds of restrictions, since video games enable you to play godlike characters and real gods.
dave2008
Legend
So you don't want high level magic to solve things. OK, how about rituals?
Well obviously you can do that now, but are you asking for WotC to provide you with "official" rules/guidelines for such things?
dave2008
Legend
What if your DM actually is god!
Vaalingrade
Legend
Nope.
And 'kids today'? I was a kid in the 80's and I wouldn't want that either and my videogames, let me check my notes here... oh yes 'were intentionally near impossible due tot he fact that they were born of arcade machines and designed to eat quarters'.
Vaalingrade
Legend
Odin won't run anything without the Book of Erotic Fantasy, and Odin, blessed with Wisdom, only plays HERO.What if your DM actually is god!
Similar Threads
