Neonchameleon
Legend
And this is a good thing. I don't want to see 0.763 casters. Indeed I find the concept of "half caster" to be its own type of ugly mess and would far rather see more classes be like warlocks and do their own thing rather than being spell level beancounters.So, again hypothetically, if a half-caster ranger is too weak, and a full-caster ranger is too strong, there must be some compromise point between half-caster and full-caster that would be roughly balanced; 5e simply has never systemically introduced more granularity into the spellcasting progression.
And given that a substantial group of people want non-casting rangers larding them down with more spells is not I think a good solution.