Can I just say that it’s kinda sad that the first original Middle Earth stories we’ve had are being crucified by book fans who are insisting that the books that largely no one has read must be adhered to?
If you can't create an original story without having to resort to altering that which already exists in order for it to fit, is it really worthwhile doing?
And the fact that fewer people have read the Silmarillion shouldn't be a valid argument. People who know the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings and who want more Middle-Earth should read what's there, first. If they can't be *rs*d to do that and want it handed to them on a platter, they should at least acknowledge the fact that those who have read those books have a right to be passionate about an accurate translation from one medium to another.
I have no problem with the completely made-up parts of the show (the Harfoots and Arondir), only with established characters and situations being altered significantly.
Absolutely. Who wants to watch Hamlet for the fifteen thousandth time without trying to recreate, change, or otherwise alter it? We shouldn't ever allow for the various Sherlock Holmes remakes? I guess we absolutely must not allow Lucy Liu to play Watson. Never minding the fantastic Irregulars. And the level of gate keeping here is pretty breath taking. People who want more Middle Earth stories "should read what's there first"? No thanks. Some of us read the Silmarillion, or at least tried to, and realized that it was dry, boring and utterly disinteresting to read.
Never minding the Lost Tales.
There is no "should" here. Those "established characters" are just fiction. They have no feelings. Reinvisioning, remaking, rewriting characters is ABSOLUTELY what you should be doing. Simply regurgitating someone else's works just to pander to a vocal, but, ultimately, tiny sliver of fandom who actually cares is the absolute worst thing they could do.
The best thing for any of these properties is to have a giant disclaimer right up front. "HERE BE NEW IDEAS. Warning, warning. If you are against new ideas then do NOT watch this. You will be disappointed."
I read the Slmarillion and prefir it over the Lord of the Rings novels.Some of us read the Silmarillion, or at least tried to, and realized that it was dry, boring and utterly disinteresting to read.
Ok, totally made my day with this.No, I'm still upset about de Troyes putting his ridiculous Gary Stu self-insert Lancelot into Arthurian stories. If you have no respect for the canon don't write it!
Sorry, I did get carried away there. I found it too dry and boring to read. Not that it's badly written or anything like that. I just bounced right off of it and totally could not get into it. Then again, I've read both the Hobbit and Lord of the Rings multiple times and still have not read more than the first two lines of any of the poetry in any of the books. As soon as that indent hits, I'm skipping pages.I read the Slmarillion and prefir it over the Lord of the Rings novels.
but yeah I get your point and am enjoying RoP
still haven't read themI think I was about twenty years old before I actually learned the Appendix was meant to be read.
The best thing for any of these properties is to have a giant disclaimer right up front. "HERE BE NEW IDEAS. Warning, warning. If you are against new ideas then do NOT watch this. You will be disappointed."
I still have not read more than the first two lines of any of the poetry in any of the books. As soon as that indent hits, I'm skipping pages.