Storm Raven said:How is Palladium successful if everyone hates their games?
By "Nobody," I mean, "Nobody who frequents online fora," which is a small proportion of gamers.
Storm Raven said:How is Palladium successful if everyone hates their games?
Storm Raven said:How is Palladium successful if everyone hates their games?
The numbers are fluctuating quickly. Just look at the thread, and you see that the PHB and M:tAw exchanged their relative positions twice in a few hours. In the long run, I see that W:tF still sells well, whereas V:tR has seen its heydays.eyebeams said:That would be true if you wanted to believe that I thought a single hour was important, which I don't. Having looked at these for a while, these surges usually last a couple of weeks -- in some cases, a couple of months.
He countered your statistics. He agreed on the point I mentioned in my last post.Then Mike hardly "countered," what I was saying.
tensen said:Probably more accurate to say "nobody here" likes them.
Crothian said:And even that's not accurate......there are some of us who still like what they are doing.
eyebeams said:By "Nobody," I mean, "Nobody who frequents online fora," which is a small proportion of gamers.
Oh, absolutely. There's something kind of homey about it to me.eyebeams said:Really, I think the legacy of the brand is a big deal.
Storm Raven said:Is there any evidence that the gamers in the online community are not generally representative by taste? By that I mean, is there evidence that gamers who use the internet are more hostile to a company like Palladium than gamers in general?
By "everyone" I think eyebeams is talking about on any boards except the Palladium ones.Storm Raven said:How is Palladium successful if everyone hates their games?
Storm Raven said:Is there any evidence that the gamers in the online community are not generally representative by taste?