Wormwood said:I'd buy that in a second.
Publishers take note!
I agree, but this requires a rule set that accepts the notion of damaging specific areas and one that is willing to tell a PC "No, you cant cut through the scales at these points."TwinBahamut said:I am probably getting to this bandwagon a little late, but...
This was a great post. Right along with Villain Classes, your Encounter Monster is a great thing. Using a monster as a scene or a monster as terrain are two ideas that D&D could stand to use a lot more.
Forget putting it in as a footnote in a Monster Manual, or a DMG, this kind of thing deserves its own book, full of nothing but detailed scenes of this kind. It would be a very useful resorce for DMs, especially those with little prep time.
Kamikaze Midget said:...and hire me to write it!![]()
Wormwood said:I'd buy that in a second.
Publishers take note!
That's a very cool beastie, and I'm likely to use it as a lesser form of Galchutt, but again, it goes to the problem of playing off expectations that are never actually addressed in D&D properly: the lack of a sea serpent in the core rules.Beckett said:Check out the bestiary in Pathfinder 3: there's a creature called the Mother of Oblivion. It's a gargantuan outsider that looks like a sea serpent mixed with an octopus. Bite, four tentacle, improved grab and constrict.
There is some spell-like stuff that goes with it's outsider nature, but most of that can be stripped off.