Kamikaze Midget said:It's not a BAD policy, and I'm sure medical conditions will (logically) be exempted somehow. It is, however, totally harsh.
I grew up in a city with that policy. No eating either. Last year I moved to a city that doesn't have that policy and I do notice more spilled drinks on seats and the floor as a result. You may not love the policy but it will cut janitorial costs and raise revenues for very little inconvenience. The only people who will be really hurt are the convenience stores in and near the subway.Bartmanhomer said:Did anybody saw the news. The mayor in New York City (Which I lived here in Manhattan) said that starting in October If anybody caught drinking regardless if it's beer, water, milk and other drinks you'll get a fine! That unethical!![]()
Aeson said:Don't ride the subway. Drive your car and get all your friends to drive their own car.
Yes. I almost got ran over twice in a city where no one supposed to drive. Its an insane city to drive in so it appears.the Jester said:Have you ever been in NYC?
![]()
I grew up in Vancouver, BC.Bartmanhomer said:Fusangite, didn't somebody even complained about the no eating rule? By the way which city did you live Fusangite?
I don't know if it's unethical. Mind you, Hawaii does not have a rail transit system so I wouldn't know but our bus transit system does prohibit drinking while bus is in operation. I can understand that especially having been spilled by a passenger violating that code when the bus I'm on made a sudden stop. Of course, I don't understand why they don't make buses with non-slip floor.Bartmanhomer said:Did anybody saw the news. The mayor in New York City (Which I lived here in Manhattan) said that starting in October If anybody caught drinking regardless if it's beer, water, milk and other drinks you'll get a fine! That unethical!![]()