heirodule said:"Encyclopedia of Monsters, volume 4: L,M,N"
Elementals

Kurashu said:While Oozes themselves might not warrent an entire book on their own, they could combine it with another type. What that type would be, I don't know. But I'd be interested in learning of the softer side of oozes. You know the side of them that calls their friends to go out for lunch ("I hear there's a party of adventures coming through later today.") or just wants to spend time with their spouse on a romantic everning ("Honey, that halfling was delicious.").
...Maybe not.
Shapechangers would be a definite buy for me.
Klaus said:I'd like to see a book on Fey. And that's not because I'm currently envisioning a fey-descended warlock (CG) whose eldritch blasts look like she's using a bow made of faerie fire and who takes Obtain Familiar to have a buckawn as a familiar.![]()
I disagree. IMO, the strength of the Draconomicon (well, in addition to being generally high quality) is that dragons are rather similar to one another. You pretty much know what to expect from a dragon: physically powerful, breath weapon, relatively minor magic, high levels of cunning, etc. Sure, there are differences between types, but the similarities are a lot bigger.Bad Paper said:magical beasts, yo

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.