Gentlegamer
Adventurer
I did not say it was the "normal" criteria! You have to look closely.fusangite said:Gentlegamer,
First of all, I really don't see how an angel (Gandalf) assisted by a powerful magic item (Narya) is a cleric under any definition. All this sanctioned versus unsanctioned magic blather does not erase the fact that a hypostasized angel using a magic ring does not meet any normal set of criteria for what a cleric is.
The sanctioned and unsanctioned bit I get directly from MERP. It fits well into the way such matters are handled in Lord of the Rings.Cleric does not mean "user of sanctioned magic" in anyone's book. Even if I were to accept your formulation of Middle Earth magic, which I don't, you still can't force a brand new definition on the term cleric. Cleric means priest. Gandalf is not a priest; he's a divinity. The fact that a divinity can do things a priest can also do does not make the divinity into a priest.
I would argue that there are no clerics in Middle Earth because there is no formal religion. Devotion is not shown to the Valar in a way that entails priestly worship.
As I posted, an examination of the context of Middle-earth and their roles and outlook makes Gandalf a cleric. The absense of a formal religion is no bar to the existance of clerics, even in a game world. Regardless of the type of being that Gandalf is, he is a servant of a higher power, which is certainly congruent with clerical requirements.
I do not claim that Lord of the Rings fits neatly into D&D; I only wish to counter the assertion that there are no clerics in Middle-earth or Lord of the Rings. You're free to disagree. Just don't let a too scrict reliance on arbitrary game definitions hinder you.Finally, why would you expect that the LOTR narrative could be represented in D&D anyway? Tolkien's world is not compatible with D&D.