Things you Dont Like About 3.5

What Dont You Like?

  • The Damage Reduction

    Votes: 14 6.7%
  • No Spell Failure for Bards

    Votes: 16 7.7%
  • More Skill Points for Rangers

    Votes: 10 4.8%
  • More Skill Points for Bards

    Votes: 6 2.9%
  • TWF AND Archery Combat Paths for Ranger

    Votes: 27 13.0%
  • Monks Getting Ki Strike Sooner(Seperate from DR Issues)

    Votes: 7 3.4%
  • Sorcerers Still Cant Quicken

    Votes: 68 32.7%
  • More Bardic Music Effects for Bards

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • Bard Spell List Expanded

    Votes: 2 1.0%
  • Druid Spell List Expanded

    Votes: 2 1.0%
  • The New Haste

    Votes: 31 14.9%
  • The New Harm

    Votes: 9 4.3%
  • The New Hold Person

    Votes: 12 5.8%
  • No New Class Skills for Sorcerers

    Votes: 84 40.4%
  • Better DR for Barbarians

    Votes: 6 2.9%
  • The Mystic Theurge

    Votes: 58 27.9%
  • The Arcane Trickster in the DMG

    Votes: 23 11.1%
  • The Eldritch Knight

    Votes: 8 3.8%
  • The Horizon Walker

    Votes: 8 3.8%
  • The Thaumaturgist

    Votes: 9 4.3%
  • The Red Wizard In the DMG

    Votes: 46 22.1%
  • The Hierophant In the DMG

    Votes: 17 8.2%
  • The Archmage In the DMG

    Votes: 21 10.1%
  • The Duelist In the DMG

    Votes: 8 3.8%
  • The Dragon Disciple In the DMG

    Votes: 19 9.1%
  • Weapon Familiarity

    Votes: 14 6.7%
  • No More Partial Action

    Votes: 14 6.7%
  • I Like Everything I Have Seen of 3.5

    Votes: 21 10.1%
  • I Dislike Everything I Have Seen of 3,5

    Votes: 4 1.9%
  • I can't really decide until I see the whole thing

    Votes: 70 33.7%


log in or register to remove this ad



What I don't like is the hype and such on it. I know very little about it and some act like I should. My exposure to it is limited to Dragon mag and here. Here is more a rumors/what if. I'm still not sure if I'm picking up a copy yet. rant rant rant b**ch b**th b**th blah blah blah!
 



The moaning and whining is great. No, seriously, it's very constructive. WotC values and needs your opinion...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...FOR THEM TO POOP ON!

All kidding aside though, I do have a complaint. The name. It's just so software-geeky. Couldn't they have just called it 3E Revised or something? Heck, I'd have preferred "4th Edition" over this ".5" nonsense.
 

Wow! WHat a great ad for 3.5E; I didn't really care about the game until I saw the poll. Nonetheless, I checked all the prestige class boxes because I'm against them on principle.
 

Sorcerers still can't quicken
The new haste
No new class skills for sorcerers
The Red Wizard in the DMG

For other changes, I am waiting to see the rest of the game before I make an opinion. Sorcerers were, IMO, somewhat shafted, being balanced only when made for combat. And now that, thanks to the new haste and the old metamagic system, they can't even be effective combat machines...
The fact that their puny class skill list don't improve is also annoying. Adding diplomacy, intimidation and use magic device to them will stay a house rule of mine.
And finally, I would have liked a new setting-specific PrC, rather than a rewarmed Red Wizard. As I said in the DMG 3.5 PRC thread, a Scarlet Brother would have been nice, especially given that it would have made 4 new PrC rather than 3 (provided the horizon walker isn't the gatecrasher from the MotP, in which case we would have only 2 new PrC).
 

maddman75 said:
Don't like the theurge, red wizard or archmage. Keep yer munchkin realms crap out of the core!

You confused theurge with hierophant. The theurge is new. The hierophant is a generic PrC put in the realms (there were 6 generic PrC put there).
 

Remove ads

Top