Chris_Nightwing
First Post
Just give the damned monks in question some gauntlets and cast it on them. End of story.
Chris_Nightwing said:Just give the damned monks in question some gauntlets and cast it on them. End of story.
KarinsDad said:
Well, for such a brilliant guy, it took you nearly 3 days to look it up.
So, I will quote you:
Sheesh
That's what you gotta love about these boards (not). There is always someone bitching about someone else's bitching.![]()
AGGEMAM said:
Who is flaming now.
It is not in the errata, it is in the corrections and clarifications version 2.
I do not think I was the only one, who did not realise that there was a newer version of this.
AGGEMAM said:
Gaunlets are no more weapons than unarmed strike are.
Gaunlets lets you deal normal damage instead of subdual damage.
If you are not considered armed with your unarmed strike niether are you while wearing gaunlets.
spunky_mutters said:Also, the original question in that thread had to do with casting MW or GMW on Bracers of Striking. It got a little off-topic, but that point wasn't completely resolved. There was a quote about them being treated like Blunt Weapons for purposes of enhancement magic, so that lends credence to it.
Bracers of Striking:The wearer of bracers of striking is considered armed even when unarmed (as if he had the Improved Unarmed Strike feat).
The bracers may be modified with special weapon abilities as if they were a blunt weapon (though they cound as a double weapon, so double the cost of any ability).
--- Magic of Faerun, page 155; lower right corner