TWF and Haste

[myradale]

Ok, probably been argued to death... if so, just post a link to the thread. If not....

From the SRD on Haste:
"When making a full attack action, a hasted creature may make one extra attack with any weapon he is holding"


So, does the guy get one extra attack, or one extra attack per weapon he's holding?
The first seems more balanced, but the second makes more sense physically.

Let me know what you think...
David

 

[Crothian]

Only one attack with any weapon he is holding...not one attack with each weapon he is holding.

 

[Altamont Ravenard]

Or else the sentence would have been "an extra attack with EVERY weapon he's holding"

AR

 

[ThirdWizard]

Does that mean natural attacks and unarmed strikes get no haste attack benefit? I mean, if you have to make the attack with a weapon you're holding...

 

[Jdvn1]

Eesh. I guess RAW, no. I'd allow it, though.

 

[Crothian]

i imagine its an error of bad wording, no reason to think they actually meant that

 

[ThirdWizard]

Oh, I'm sure they didn't, and I wouldn't even consider the thought of playing it that way. It's good for a laugh though.

 

[dcollins]

Shhh... don't let Hyp hear that.