Pielorinho
Iron Fist of Pelor
The Kender said:Things like this make me consider quitting gaming. This is not the example of gamers that I like and respect.
normally dissecting humor is a losing proposition. But in this instance, three different people have expressed disgust with the joke, and I'm baffled. Those of you that don't like it, would you explain why?
I'll get the ball rolling: I'll explain why I DO like it.
Enron's collapse left a lot of people in the lurch: employees, sure, but also people whose retirement funds were wrapped up in the company. Lots of little old ladies and men are suffering because of Enron. Their plight isn't funny: it's very sad.
Some people suspect that the higher-ups in Enron were responsible for the company's collapse, that they knew it was coming, that they knew how many people would suffer because of it, and that they didn't care. That's not funny: it's terrible.
But taking the best-known person in the company and placing him in a situation where he acts in a cartoonishly greedy fashion exagerrates what he's done and lets us laugh at his awfulness. That's funny.
Add to that the mental whiplash of the joke. It starts off reading like a true story, but quickly moves into glurge (who honestly believes that an impoverished mother would give two $100 bills to her kids to buy Valentine's day presents with?). We readers are at first open to the story, and then mildly disgusted with the vanilla moral that it obviously has coming up.
And then it has a totally surprise ending, with the swiping of the money. And then another totally suprising ending, with the signature. Surprises can enhance humor.
Okay, that's why I liked it. Why didn't Kender, Snofox, et al not like it?
Daniel