Hypersmurf
Moderatarrrrh...
Hypersmurf said:I'm away from my books at the moment, so I don't have the text of Improved Weapon Familiarity available, but someone else might be able to figure it out...
Ha!
This goes back the the Improved Natural Attack debate.
A half-elf is considered an elf "for all effects related to race".
There are three main positions to be considered here:
1. Feats are effects.
2. Feats are not effects, but the benefits of feats are effects.
3. Feats are not effects.
One thing you could point your DM to is the Stoneblessed PrC in Races of Stone.
"In addition, for all effects related to race, a stoneblessed is considered a member of the race to which she is bonded. For example, dwarf-bonded stoneblessed are just as vulnerable to effects and abilities that affect dwarves as actual dwarves are (such as a ranger's favored enemy ability), and they can use magic items that are usable only by dwarves. The stoneblessed meets any racial prerequisite for prestige classes and feats as if she were a member of her bonded race."
Now, it's not a hundred percent clear whether this is "For all effects related to race, you're a member - such as meeting racial prerequisites for feats", or "For all effects related to race, you're a member. Also, you meet racial prerequisites for feats."
To be honest, I believe it's the second - if meeting prerequisites for feats were still part of the example of what "for all effects" meant, it would say "as if they were dwarves" rather than "as if she were a member of her bonded race". In addition, there are feats and prestige classes out there with a racial prerequisite of "Elf or half-elf", and if Elven Blood permitted a half-elf to take feats and PrCs as if he were an elf, this would be redundant.
Fortunately, IWF doesn't have a racial prerequisite, and since I consider the benefit of a feat to be an effect (while the feat itself is not), I'd allow a half-elf to take it for proficiency in the elven weapons.
-Hyp.
Last edited: