pawsplay said:
These masses must be anchored to two or more solid and diametrically opposed points or else the web collapses upon itself and disappears.
Therefore, it is not anchored to every other surface, which means there is space. Specifically, two points diametric to each other, mirrored to the anchor points, will be clear.
Not sure I get your point here. 2 or more solid points. 2 is a minimum, so you technically could have a 20' spread with only 2 poles 40' from each other to support it, but if you want, a 20' radius room could have virtually all of its surfaces serve as anchor points. Regardless, even if someone chose 2 discrete points along a 40' long, 10' wide, 10' tall corridor to serve as the requisite "anchors", the spread still fills the entire volume of that stretch of corridor, serving as a visual and physical obstacle (not impenetrable, but an obstacle nonetheless).
pawsplay said:
A glowing, pea-sized bead streaks from the pointing digit and, unless it impacts upon a material body or solid barrier prior to attaining the prescribed range, blossoms into the fireball at that point. (An early impact results in an early detonation.) If you attempt to send the bead through a narrow passage, such as through an arrow slit, you must “hit” the opening with a ranged touch attack, or else the bead strikes the barrier and detonates prematurely.
Since a web isn't a "barrier" but an entanglement, it's questionable whether it would prematurely detonate. But even if it did, the shot is a cinch, much easier than an arrow slit.
I'm not really buying this barrier/entanglement distinction you propose. I think a "many-layered mass of strong, sticky strands" that are "similar to spider webs but far larger and tougher" and that can "trap those caught in them" can present an obstacle. Since 5-15' of Web provides a cover bonus against arrows and 20' of Web totally blocks arrows, I think it's a reasonable bet that you stand a chance of detonating a fireball bead on one of the strands on the way to the center. But the ease of the shot, as I said in my previous post, is a matter of opinion. I say it's harder than an arrow slit, you say it's a cinch, but ultimately it's the call of whoever's DMing.
pawsplay said:
If the damage caused to an interposing barrier shatters or breaks through it, the fireball may continue beyond the barrier if the area permits; otherwise it stops at the barrier just as any other spell effect does.
Even if the web is a barrier, it will provide no protection. An early detonation would still destroy most of the web.
Agreed. As I said, the Web provides no cover against the flames of a fireball. The only ones spared would be those who are not in its area in the first place, i.e. possibly those at the far end. Just how far (or whether any are spared) depends on how far the DM and the dice (if applicable) let you get the bead to the center of the Web.
pawsplay said:
Simply standing some distance back from the web will provide adequate protection from backblasts. Cover is determined by the depth of the web, not distance from it.
It's not hard to get that distance under ideal circumstances, but in a dungeon setting the danger may present itself, and if the DM rules that it is a difficult shot, you may need to get close to maximize your chances of visualizing an unobstructed path through the mass of strands to hit the center. Not sure of your point in highlighting the difference between depth vs. distance, as I don't see any disagreement on that.