I quite like this point ...
But does this mean that all wererats can survive falls of any height as they are immune to any form of falling damage? (c.f. breaking/damaging bones)
I quite like this point ...
But does this mean that all wererats can survive falls of any height as they are immune to any form of falling damage? (c.f. breaking/damaging bones)
No, but I would agree they would think they are following RAW.
It's not a good point at all. The goal and approach stated by the player in that example is to beat a wererat to death with a club. That very clearly calls the rules for weapons and hit point reduction into play whereas strangling a wererat to death does not.
That is a fair question considering that poster's position and one that I believe comes up with some frequency in damage immunity/reduction discussions.
So, if the party push the wererat off a cliff will it suffer damage - or have the weaponised the cliff?No, they aren't immune since falling damage isn't caused by a weapon.
No, they aren't immune since falling damage isn't caused by a weapon.
That is ridiculous.
How so?
So you can't push a sword into a wererat but you can push a wererat into a sword.