James Gasik
We don't talk about Pun-Pun
Hooked on Psionics helped me, and it can help you too!
Historically speaking what we think of as "psionics" grew out of the work of mediums and spiritualists in the 19th and early 20th century. Since science was the language of the day, the supernatural effects they were "manifesting" were couched in scientific language instead of mystical language. From that we get parapsychology as an area of study and eventually science fiction writers using the pseudo-science of their day in their stories. That's why I don't really have a problem treating psionics as a form of magic - historically that's what it is.RE: Magic vs. Psionics
Just finished reading "Lord Darcy", and thought it was kind of interesting (in a way relevant to this thread) that a big portion of the magic is stuff that feels psionic (or is adjacent to it in an obvious way), is approached scientifically by those in the world (mathematics underlies a lot of it), and requires innate talent to use -- but it's called magic, viewed as being the truth of what was really behind things like witchcraft, and uses material components (although ones that seem to make sense in interesting ways).
Both weave and mind share the same pie, with the same thematic spell effects. But they go about the magic differently.If you view magic as a pie graph, arcane and divine magic have huge slices, making it hard to figure out what they shouldn't be allowed to do, which has always been a big problem in Psionics design.