It means we cannot complain, and must contribute to the thread with an assumed positive perspective towards the topic.I'm relatively new to this forum, but I've seen that "(+)" on threads before. What does it mean?
Then start at level 3. That is a low level (still within the starting levels of 5e). We start at level 0. The only way to accommodate your taste and mine is to have things come on at different levels. So, the compromise is to have different starting points. If that is case, moving up generally is perceived as simpler.The question was asked about what can be done to draw me to one d&d - a focus on thematics at low level would excite me.
One of my biggest pet peeves has been that EK’s get nothing magical before level 3. IMO that really hurts there thematic appeal when starting at level 1.
1. This is a + thread.Then start at level 3. That is a low level (still within the starting levels of 5e). We start at level 0. The only way to accommodate your taste and mine is to have things come on at different levels. So, the compromise is to have different starting points. If that is case, moving up generally is perceived as simpler.
No, sorry no way to compromise. Currently I have the the ability to have my sorcerer act as a cleric replacement - a group's primary healer- from day one no matter the level. I'm not willing to give that up.Then start at level 3. That is a low level (still within the starting levels of 5e). We start at level 0. The only way to accommodate your taste and mine is to have things come on at different levels. So, the compromise is to have different starting points. If that is case, moving up generally is perceived as simpler.
The continuing lack of the warlord/marshal in 5E is extremely weird, especially as 1D&D would be an ideal time to bring them back and kick the hype train into high gear.the warlord for starters.
My bad, i jump around so many threads I forgot where i was1. This is a + thread.
2. I answered what would get me excited about 1 D&D. You don’t have to be excited about the same things I am and in a normal thread I’d be happy to debate you more, but this is a + thread.
3. Low level play is my favorite. I especially like levels 1 and 2.
I have no idea what your talking about; however, compromise is often a good thingNo, sorry no way to compromise. Currently I have the the ability to have my sorcerer act as a cleric replacement - a group's primary healer- from day one no matter the level. I'm not willing to give that up.
Yeah, I know compromise is good, but this time we have mutually exclusive preferences. Having 1st level be thematically defining for sorcerers is one of the best things about the class, and particularly when it allows them to be healers from first level, it lets me have a sorcerer who is a primary healer no matter the level and assume that role from the beginning. Losing that means that I no longer can join a game as the primary healer with a sorcerer. If you get what you want I lose what I like. Asking the party to be without a primary healer for two levels only for my sake is a tall order.I have no idea what your talking about; however, compromise is often a good thing
A proper, working monster creator. Bring back 4E monster design. Bring back balanced classes. Classes and subclasses should feel different, but there shouldn’t be disparity so glaringly obvious it’s visible from space. Remember that it’s a game and the books are technical manuals, so writing clear rules is the primary goal. A proper release of Spelljammer…something more akin to Ravenloft with a big single book of setting, lore, monsters, and adventure seeds…that, you know, contains the rules you need for the setting. A proper release of Dark Sun…with the Ravenloft treatment, not the slipcase nonsense. Or at least a slipcase with a proper full-sized book.If you're a lapsed player - or simply a burned-out one like me - what would you like to see to get you excited?
I also dislike this; all subclasses at 3rd level new idea.The question was asked about what can be done to draw me to one d&d - a focus on thematics at low level would excite me.
One of my biggest pet peeves has been that EK’s get nothing magical before level 3. IMO that really hurts there thematic appeal when starting at level 1.
I agree. Also, I know folks don't want to hear this, but I think they should examine ability mod to spell DC too. That is part of the imbalance problem as well.Have all spells that are published in 5E in 1D&D PHB,
possibly balanced between all 6 saves.