What does "does not stack with" mean?

[kreynolds]

kreynolds - drop the crack pipe and back away from the keyboard.

LOL Yeah, I finally dropped the pipe last night.

Seldom if ever on these boards have i read a person;s posts who was so trapped in his own mind.

Ummm...I don't think I was trapped in my own mind...but then...I don't know. Probably not...ramble...ramble...ramble. Seriously though, I was in a feisty mood and felt like shooting down the lame arguments having nothing to do with the topic that kept getting tossed around. Too much testosterone I guess.

Were you going somewhere with this? I don't catch your implication...

It was a general statement and I wasn't implicating you. If I ever do implicate you in anything, trust me, I'll address you personally. I respect you and owe you that much at least.

 

[kreynolds]

kreynolds - drop the crack pipe and back away from the keyboard.
Seldom if ever on these boards have i read a person;s posts who was so trapped in his own mind.

But I don't think there is any reason to stoop to childhood behavior and start throwing insults around. Do you, reapersaurus? Oh look...you've got me doing it. It's early morning for me, bad time to pick a fight with me. Better yet, don't pick a fight at all, reaper. I, and I think a few other members, would appreciate that level of maturity.

Thanks.

 

[CRGreathouse]

It was a general statement and I wasn't implicating you. If I ever do implicate you in anything, trust me, I'll address you personally. I respect you and owe you that much at least.

Thank you for that. I wasn't directing any of my post at you; just trying to figure out how to respond.

 

[SpikeyFreak]

This thread just won the Most Confusing Thread Award, and I think kreynolds should be the reicipient.

My problem with the whole "not cumulative with" thing is that I think they meant that you should NOT be able to get an extra attack from both speed and haste in the same round, but that's NOT what it says.

If you really go by what it says, you get either an extra attack from a speed weapon or an extra partial action from haste, which is just silly. I attacked on extra time because I have a +4 enhancement on my weapon, but I can't use haste now.

Right now, I'm considering it a house rule, but I'm playing it as you can benefit from both the same round, but you can't get an attack from a speed weapon on a haste partial action.

--Proud Spikey

Edit: you miss one little NOT and what you meant to say just goes flying out the window....

 

[IceBear]

I think that's what I'm going to do too Spikey.

I haven't really read this thread or looked at the Speed enchantment, but your summation is pretty much my understanding and feelings too.

IceBear

 

[Ristamar]

I have sent this issue off to ol' Skiznip. I'll post a response if/when it comes.

 

[SpikeyFreak]

your summation is pretty much my understanding and feelings too.

Well, I just added a "NOT" so you might want to reread it and see if you still agree.

--NOT Spikey

 

[IceBear]

If you really go by what it says, you get either an extra attack from a speed weapon or an extra partial action from haste, which is just silly. I attacked on extra time because I have a +4 enhancement on my weapon, but I can't use haste now.

Right now, I'm considering it a house rule, but I'm playing it as you can benefit from both the same round, but you can't get an attack from a speed weapon on a haste partial action.

This is the part that I was agreeing with you about

IceBear

 

[kreynolds]

This thread just won the Most Confusing Thread Award, and I think kreynolds should be the reicipient.

Thanks! But it ain't all me.

 

[Oracular Vision]

Why can't you noobers just listen to Caliban? He explains it just fine...Caliban and Job, suffering the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune together...