scruffygrognard
Adventurer
Fighter: Pathfinder
Cleric: 2nd edition AD&D
Rogue: Pathfinder
Wizard: 1st edition AD&D
Cleric: 2nd edition AD&D
Rogue: Pathfinder
Wizard: 1st edition AD&D
I meant overall, as in the kinds of combat styles the rogue can use, the freedom to focus on combat or exploration or interaction, and yes skills.
The main difference in skill versatility is skill points vs. trained skills. A 3e rogue gets to learn new things every level if he so chooses. That means the 4e rogue cannot be "strictly" more versatile. Which you consider more versatile depends on what you mean by it.
This is also the difference between PF (again esp. BB) and 4e, which otherwise have quite similar short skill lists.
Other than Two Weapon Fighting, what kinds of combat styles do you think the 3e Rogue can use that the 4e one can't?
And the PF rogue is closer to the 4e rogue than the 3e rogue is. This I don't dispute. The 4e skills are still more flexible, [...]
Almost all of the 4e rogue's powers are tied to a light blade or a crossbow. That means no elven rogues with longswords or longbows, for example. In 3e you could also go unarmed or use a sap to deal non-lethal sneaks. (Of course, in 4e you get to choose if you leave the enemy alive, no matter how you kill him.)
If you want to count skills, PF BB Rogue is 8 + Int out of 19 skills. 4e is 6 (two set) out of 17 skills. The PF one has the flexible skill point system.
There's a feat for the longsword. And IIRC for unarmed. That said, I don't like rogues with screamingly obvious weapons - I'd prefer urban rangers.