What if any changes in alignment restrictions would you like to see in 3.5?

[Merlion]

Ok I just want to see how many people would like to see what changes, if any

 

[Tiberius]

You did it again. Still single choice.

-Tiberius

 

[DM_Matt]

Wipe them out.....all of them.

 

[Tonguez]

Um why have you posted the same poll twice?

 

[KDLadage]

I think it was meant to correct the "only able to choose one answer" delima. It was not fixed, however.

 

[Merlion]

I fixed it on the 3rd try. go to Alignment in 3.5 to vote

 

[Gez]

I voted "Paladin: Any Good", but actually, I'm rather "Paladin: LG or NG". Chaotic paladin sounds like an oxymoron.

 

[Merlion]

lol dont see why...they made a prestige class of it.
although this version of the thread doesnt have the multiple choice option I had to re do it....as Alignment Restrictions in 3.5

 

[Gez]

lol dont see why...

Paladin, from old francic palatin, from latin palatius (or something like that, I suck at latin): elite palace guards, or elite palace knights. Liege of the emperor. Can't see them as chaotic combattant fighting autority.

But NG, to accomodate to a more D&Dish vision of them as the knights of goodness, defenders of widows and orphans, yes.