jcfiala
Explorer
RangerWickett said:An interesting question on my mind is, how would D&D and gaming be different if Hasbro hadn't bought WotC?
Well, that's an interesting question. 3.5 would probably have been released this year, or maybe next year, as Peter A. would still be in charge of the company and would have waited to release the revision. Various 3rd party publishers might have been warned about the changeover in advance, so that they could sell through old 3rd edition stock and get ready for the 3.5. I don't know if the setting search was something that came about because of Hasbro, but hopefully we'd still have Eberron around. However, we might not have Star Wars d20 - I can't remember, but could swear the RPG license for SW that WotC has is part of the general Toy license that Hasbro has. (Then again, if Hasbro had the license, they might have sub-licensed it out to Wizards just because Wizards is so big. On the other hand, if they didn't have Wizards and did have the license, maybe they would have bought what was left of West End and continued that Star Wars game with a 3rd edition of it's own - it would have been fairly cheap, and there was a lot of experience there in dealing with Lucas.)
Hasbro didn't buy WotC because WotC needed the cash - as I understand it was a move made to give the shareholders in WotC a profit on their purchase.