Sorry, been away for a day. Anyways, this particular player is fairly new and while I do try and remind him frequently, I am also a fairly new GM and I don't want to end up having to remind every player of their circumstantial bonuses every combat session while still balancing out a group of enemies against them, etc.
As for why he didn't take the fighter thug variant or the sneaky fighter variant: he wants to be fairly decent at stealth. What he is making is more of an urban bounty hunter character. He was originally going to go with a full fighter, but the rest of the party was focusing to some degree on stealth and subtlety and since he is going to be generally pulling the front lines, he wants to be able to stay in the front instead of hiding in the back and then trying to catch up if things fall apart. No I am not going to give him sneak attack though.
Oh, one thing I thought about was allowing him to put in a feat to get hide and another to get move silently as a class skill as opposed to a cross class. Would this be overpowered? That way he could play his originally intended class without being a hindrance to the party.
As for why he didn't take the fighter thug variant or the sneaky fighter variant: he wants to be fairly decent at stealth. What he is making is more of an urban bounty hunter character. He was originally going to go with a full fighter, but the rest of the party was focusing to some degree on stealth and subtlety and since he is going to be generally pulling the front lines, he wants to be able to stay in the front instead of hiding in the back and then trying to catch up if things fall apart. No I am not going to give him sneak attack though.
Oh, one thing I thought about was allowing him to put in a feat to get hide and another to get move silently as a class skill as opposed to a cross class. Would this be overpowered? That way he could play his originally intended class without being a hindrance to the party.