Indeed 25 was the kind of score for mighty character in old time.14 for you, 25 for me.
Why? Because I am both petty and old school. But I repeat myself.
So 25 should be the cap!
Indeed 25 was the kind of score for mighty character in old time.14 for you, 25 for me.
Why? Because I am both petty and old school. But I repeat myself.
I approve of this message.I'm really curious about something. Would it really be broken if you got both? How about this:
- ASI's are no longer a Feat.
- Feats no longer have the +1 ASI's built into them at all. They are only balanced against each other and without ASI's, they just broaden your functionality.
- You get both the two +1 ASI's and a Feat at the universal ASI levels. No choosing.
- Fighter bonus feats still happen, but they won't be ASI's.
I have been doing exactly this for years.I'm really curious about something. Would it really be broken if you got both? How about this:
- ASI's are no longer a Feat.
- Feats no longer have the +1 ASI's built into them at all. They are only balanced against each other and without ASI's, they just broaden your functionality.
- You get both the two +1 ASI's and a Feat at the universal ASI levels. No choosing.
- Fighter bonus feats still happen, but they won't be ASI's.
I would just add +1 ASI to all feats, if feat already has +1 ASI, those two have to go to different ability,I'm really curious about something. Would it really be broken if you got both? How about this:
- ASI's are no longer a Feat.
- Feats no longer have the +1 ASI's built into them at all. They are only balanced against each other and without ASI's, they just broaden your functionality.
- You get both the two +1 ASI's and a Feat at the universal ASI levels. No choosing.
- Fighter bonus feats still happen, but they won't be ASI's.