kreynolds
First Post
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What would you do?
It doesn't matter what method he was using. By the 123123 method, a 5=2, so his ruling was correct. His method for coming to that ruling was incorrect, but the result of that roll was perfectly fine. My theory is that he saw someone use the 123123 method but didn't fully understand how it worked. That's all I'm saying.
I have no doubt of that at all.
By the way, is there any particular reason everyone is getting all bent outta shape on this? There seems to be a very tangible tension in this thread, and I'm wondering if it's the topic or something else. Did I jump to the DMs defense too quickly? I think I might have done that.
dcollins said:I totally disagree. It was not even remotely suggested by the original post that the DM was trying to use the 123123 progression, or was referring to it, or had seen it before.
It doesn't matter what method he was using. By the 123123 method, a 5=2, so his ruling was correct. His method for coming to that ruling was incorrect, but the result of that roll was perfectly fine. My theory is that he saw someone use the 123123 method but didn't fully understand how it worked. That's all I'm saying.
dcollins said:This DM was absolutely planning on ruling that roll of 4 was equal to a result of 2.
I have no doubt of that at all.
By the way, is there any particular reason everyone is getting all bent outta shape on this? There seems to be a very tangible tension in this thread, and I'm wondering if it's the topic or something else. Did I jump to the DMs defense too quickly? I think I might have done that.