Which live-action theatrical version of The Lord of the Rings would've been better?

[Orius]

The one that was made.

I mean, really, could anyone have taken a Beatles version seriously?

 

[shilsen]

The one that was made.

I mean, really, could anyone have taken a Beatles version seriously?

Hey, if you could take this poll seriously, anything's possible

 

[bolen]

Can you give some proof of this Beatles LOTR. I think you are pulling our leg

 

[Tinker Gnome]

Can you give some proof of this Beatles LOTR. I think you are pulling our leg

He provided an article in an earlier post.

 

[Ranger REG]

The one that was made.

I mean, really, could anyone have taken a Beatles version seriously?

Mel Brook, the guy responsible for Spaceball.

 

[diaglo]

heck, i prefer the Rankin Bass version to the shat Peter Jackson made.

so the Beatles wouldn't have done any worse.

 

[Mark]

I voted for option one but would like it if we would have had both.

 

[Ranger REG]

heck, i prefer the Rankin Bass version to the shat Peter Jackson made.

You'd prefer Spaceball over Star Wars Original Trilogy.

 

[Welverin]

As many issues as I have with PJ's LotR movies, they're at least good, I however can not conceive of how a LotR movie with the Beatles could have been anything but dreadful.

heck, i prefer the Rankin Bass version to the shat Peter Jackson made.

so the Beatles wouldn't have done any worse.

You'd prefer Spaceball over Star Wars Original Trilogy.

No, no, no, yo're looking at this all wrong. It's diaglo, which means whatever isolder is better and Star Wars predates Spaceballs, thus SW is better, now if Spaceballs had come out first...

 

[Ankh-Morpork Guard]

No, no, no, yo're looking at this all wrong. It's diaglo, which means whatever isolder is better and Star Wars predates Spaceballs, thus SW is better, now if Spaceballs had come out first...

Of course, that also means that he likes the Holiday Special better than ESB.