BryonD
Hero
Nisarg said:"Many roleplaying games are more concerned with rules and statistics than the drama created within the game. Some people call those roll-playing games, since they're more focused on dice-rolling than on role-playing...Just don't get lost in the Ivory Tower. Don't deride those who see gaming as a fun hobby (which it is), or those whose roleplaying stories don't aim higher. Instead, encourage and persuade players to stretch their boundries. Storytelling is about acheiving something great through an interactive tale, but not at the expense of fun. "
I do find this statement rather ironic.
IMHO, the highest aim is to get the most out of ROLE-PLAYING and GAME at the same time.
They are critical of the minimizing the role-playing part ("roll-playing") and then turn around and forget the GAME part. "Roleplaying stories", so it isn't even a game now.
There are two ivory towers here. But it appears the best vantage point to see either one is to be standing on the other.
But this is the classic WoD debate......
As to it being an attack, um NO.
Someone needs to find a dictionary and look up the words "subjective" and "objective". So at least one author (and presumably one editor) at WW thinks that free-form improv drama is the ultimate height of RPSs (obviously not RPGs). So they think they are being helpful by spreading the holy word.
A certain percentage of humans will always find the simple statement of a dissenting opinion to be an attack. But that subjective belief will never produce objective truth.
In my completely subjective opinion, to call this specific example of opinion "vicious" is plain silly. (And some people will, of course, consider this statment an attack, even though it is not).
I do not find WW's position threatening. I find it ever so mildly amusing.