Nifft
Penguin Herder
So it turns out I was partially wrong: I've both switched and not.I look; I judge; I switch or not.
-- N, not that excited by the topic.
Cheers, -- N
So it turns out I was partially wrong: I've both switched and not.I look; I judge; I switch or not.
-- N, not that excited by the topic.
Pretty dead on. Right down to the preemptive defense of 3E.3E brought me back to D&D.
3.5 improved it.
Whenever 4E comes out, if I switch over it will be with a smile on my face because 4E will have to be awesome to get me to switch.
If 4E comes out and it isn't good enough to pull me over, I'll still have a smile on my face because there is already plenty out there to keep me in campaign arcs until I'm dead.
It's always difficult for me to make a transition if there is lots of great supporting material and a new edition comes out without great backwards compatability.
4e would have to be some combination of extremely awesome or extremely backwards compatable for me to adopt it wholesale. Otherwise, I have so much stuff for 3.x, that I could see myself running it for a long time without running out of things to do.
If it actually looks good, then I'm in.
If it diverges WAAAY too much from 3E, then I don't know if I will, because 3.5 is damned near perfect. (For reference I call 3.0 and 3.5 '3E'.)
If they create a separate set of consistent "DM rules" for NPCs that was both simplified AND balanced with respect to the PC creation options, then I'm definitely in.
Data has been collated. I still haven't actually PLAYED 4E, but I'd like to give it a try. However, I have no interest WHATSOEVER in running it.Insufficient data for a meaningful response.
I will almost certainly switch over to 4e on the day of release.