Who was the best Batman?
Well, it's really a matter of whether we're talking about who was the best Batman or who was the best Bruce Wayne. In the movie's, you'll see Wayne get way more air time. Batman's mostly going to be some stuntman.
Bale makes a great Wayne, but he obviously can't do a deep bass voice, so when he's in the batsuit we get a blatantly fake and terrible-sounding voice instead.
I was fine with both Clooney and Kilmer, in and out of the batsuit. It was everything else about those films that was wrong.
Keaton was badly miscast. His Wayne was a socially-retarded, emotionally-shut-down, inarticulate, muttering man-child. And of course, as everyone correctly assessed before the movie came out, he's physique is pretty unheroic. As noted in this thread, his face is also wrong for the mask.
Bale makes a great Wayne, but he obviously can't do a deep bass voice, so when he's in the batsuit we get a blatantly fake and terrible-sounding voice instead.
I was fine with both Clooney and Kilmer, in and out of the batsuit. It was everything else about those films that was wrong.
Keaton was badly miscast. His Wayne was a socially-retarded, emotionally-shut-down, inarticulate, muttering man-child. And of course, as everyone correctly assessed before the movie came out, he's physique is pretty unheroic. As noted in this thread, his face is also wrong for the mask.
Merlin's Shadow
First Post
I bet he can. It's just that Nolan decided to turn it up to 11.
I echo the sentiments of "What? No Kevin Conroy?", the voice of the animated Batman. I love Bale, but when I read Batman comics now I hear Kevin Conroy. Live action be damned.
I'm still not sure if I would pick Mark Hamill over Ledger for best Joker. Both are great.
Steel_Wind
Legend
I like Bale a lot, but I preferred Keaton.
It's not logical that a short comedic actor should be able to pull off Batman at all. But he did. It's a credit to Tim Burton that Keaton was ever cast in the first place.
It was the look of Keaton as Batman that did it for me, specifcially the face and the eyes. He looked *dangerous* and slightly crazed when he was in Caped Crusader form.
Let's be honest: Batman is a bit of a loon. Keaton had that dark haunted bit down well.
It's not logical that a short comedic actor should be able to pull off Batman at all. But he did. It's a credit to Tim Burton that Keaton was ever cast in the first place.
It was the look of Keaton as Batman that did it for me, specifcially the face and the eyes. He looked *dangerous* and slightly crazed when he was in Caped Crusader form.
Let's be honest: Batman is a bit of a loon. Keaton had that dark haunted bit down well.
Micheal Keaton is the best. There has to be a way for adjustment of the times, 20 years, we are talking a lot of votes that did not see Batman on the big screen.
Ranger REG
Explorer
Echo that. Sorry, Felon.
Klaus
First Post
I totally agree with Felon here. I'm old enough to have watched the 1989 Batman on the theatres, and Keaton made for a lousy Batman. He was slightly better in Batman Returns, but still no cigar.
Everybody's entitled to an opinion, though to me it's a bit like Rosie O'Donnell getting the part for Wonder Woman, failing to be true to both the character's physique and personality, and then getting ovations for it from fans. Total non sequitor.
Guess it's a "root for the underdog" or "dark horse" sort of thing, cheering on a guy who really doesn't measure up. If Keaton was merely physically inadequate, but offered up some degree of intensity, then maybe I could see everyone looking past the little-man-in-big-fake-muscle suit. But Keaton's portrayal wasn't intense; it was meek, quiet...his Batman voice was a little whispery, mumbling thing.
Yeah, I've been in these discussions before. It's clear that I just don't get whatever Keaton's appeal was, and nobody ever really sells their PoV that well.
Last edited:
Similar Threads
