An interesting choice of year. What happened in 1997?Eh, I'm sure that even back in 1977 people were saying D&D only had a couple of decades before disaster.

(I assume that’s the joke)
An interesting choice of year. What happened in 1997?Eh, I'm sure that even back in 1977 people were saying D&D only had a couple of decades before disaster.
This is a circlejerk post, right?I studied this market.
Dungeons and Dragons has less then an eighteen percent chance of surviving the next two decades without the loss of millions of games.
This is not a threat; this is the truth.
The powerful of this game destroy their own past time, stripping its resources for themselves.
Many unique playstyles will soon be unplayable due to corporate greed.
Yet here some are, posts and arguments worried about stopping me instead of stopping Hasbro.
Enworld has the knowledge to repair the rules, run the games, and punish the munchkins.
Enworld could save more games in a single year then WOTC could in a hundred.
WOTC is failing this game and its players. Thousands of games die every day while Enworld rule is resisted.
Or do those games not matter to you?
I thought it was a weird yet possibly cool start to a new play by post game. Morris could be a computer running constant simulations and spitting out the percentages. Umbran would be the crack black ops guy running the missions. And Danny A is the retired gamer in hiding who knows more than is safe.This is a circlejerk post, right?
I studied this market.
Dungeons and Dragons has less then an eighteen percent chance of surviving the next two decades without the loss of millions of games.
The powerful of this game destroy their own past time, stripping its resources for themselves.
Many unique playstyles will soon be unplayable due to corporate greed.
Yet here some are, posts and arguments worried about stopping me instead of stopping Hasbro.
WOTC is failing this game and its players.
Thousands of games die every day while Enworld rule is resisted.
Or do those games not matter to you?