Whizbang Dustyboots
Gnometown Hero
I don't think anyone's anti-sexiness, just making note that something is sexy and whom it appears to be aimed at.You cant be anti-sexy-succubus and pro tiefling.
I don't think anyone's anti-sexiness, just making note that something is sexy and whom it appears to be aimed at.You cant be anti-sexy-succubus and pro tiefling.
You cant be anti-sexy-succubus and pro tiefling.
I am...at least I appreciated the changes the 5e monster manual made to the relevant monsters. I want to show this game to my friends, and to kids! without feeling uncomfortable.I don't think anyone's anti-sexiness, just making note that something is sexy and whom it appears to be aimed at.
It's definitely easier to share the 2025 Monster Manual with people without coming off like a weird creep.I am...at least I appreciated the changes the 5e monster manual made to the relevant monsters. I want to show this game to my friends, and to kids! without feeling uncomfortable.
its sexy succubi and inccubi…or rapey onesBlah blag
page 230 of the 1E DMG would like a word with that...You cant be anti-sexy-succubus and pro tiefling.
I was curious about this so I paged through PHB 2014. It turns out there is basically no romance in that artwork, with one superficially heterosexual image associated with the charmed condition.
It would be cool to see information for the other core books.
its sexy succubi and inccubi…or rapey ones