JoeGKushner said:I didn't vote.
I don't think the DI is wooing people but I was a fan of the old print magazines. I'm still getting used to the online format. So far it's not working for me personally. I also agee with others who've stated that with 4e on the horizon, it's not a priority for WoTC.
Actually, that is part of why getting rid of Dragon was a bad move. With their desire (need) to build up enthusiansm in the new edition of D&D, Dragon magazine would have been a very powerful means of hyping the new material!

And not having the resources (and will) to really push their Digital format, ending Dragon at this critical time was an even worse decision for the coming edition.

I am also, even more disapointed that Dungeon was ended. Game Companies rightly point out that modules do not sell well enough to justify the publication cost, yet many adults (like myself) don't have the time to write every adventure from scratch.

Dungeon was a good compromise. Because it was a single item, it does not bear the publication/marketing/etc. costs of a module, but none the less provided a large number of good quality pre-written adventures.

Further, just as Dragon was the best tool to market the new edition, Dungeon was and equally useful instrument to generate interrest in the settings that WoTC has announced that they will be creating (I believe "one new setting a year" was the word on the street).

I expect that the Gleemax/DI digital magazines will be high quality, I just think that they might not be the best tools right at this time.

(B.T.W., no I do not work for, nor have I ever worked for Pazio)