Worlds of Design: Which Came First, the Character or Their Backstory?

Should you create an elaborate backstory for a character or should the character’s adventures...

Should you create an elaborate backstory for a character or should the character’s adventures tell their own story?


Picture courtesy of Pixabay.

I was reading part of the Xanathar’s Guide to Everything for Fifth Edition Dungeons & Dragons the other day, specifically the tables intended to help players flesh out the backstory of their characters. They’re an aid to imagination for those who want a detailed background. You could easily take an hour or more making one up.

Detailed backgrounds can include lists of family, friends, where the character has lived, and possibly many important/formative experiences. While reading, I had a minor epiphany about the target markets for role-playing games.

RPGs Aren’t New Anymore​

After more than 45 years, virtually all the tabletop game players (board games or otherwise) in the world have been exposed to RPGs. They may have decided they don’t want fantasy, or that RPGs are too unstructured for them, or don’t play for many other reasons, or can't find a campaign to play in, but they know what is available.

Consequently, if a publisher wants to expand its reach, increase its sales beyond the known group, then they have to attract people who are not gamers, or who’ve been gamers only a short time. That means not relying on standard gaming tropes and branching out in ways that tell different stories.

I’d include many of these video gamers in the gamer group that is familiar with tabletop RPGs even if they don’t play them. AAA list video games are often “experiences” with a pure avatar representing the character. This derives in large part from D&D. Or to put it another way, even if there are gamers who don’t play tabletop role-playing games, they’re already familiar with the basics of D&D-style play.

A New Audience​

The biggest RPGs, such as D&D, have every incentive to broaden their interest for non-gamers, for people who have not yet come to RPGs or have come to RPGs recently. This is in large part reflective of the increasingly diverse voices who are now playing. Additional rulebooks such as Xanathar's are filling in the gaps of traditional game rules with more storytelling options that aren’t limited to “whether or not you know D&D.”

Just before reading the Xanathar book, I checked out the Cortex Prime site on the web. From reading the initial rules and description it’s clear the game supports storytelling in more detail than traditional D&D. Yes, there is some dice rolling, but it’s arranged to be “ready to collaborate on a shared story” (quoting from the site). And it’s free.

For players looking to share epic stories of their characters’ adventures, creating a story beforehand helps players engage with the game before it’s even started. This is different from how I was introduced to tabletop games.

Developing a Story​

This is not to say that traditional tabletop games can’t evolve their own stories. The difference is that when I played, we started with blank slates as characters and then the adventures told the story. Background generators weren’t necessary because your character may not have lasted very long, and the assumption was that the story would come later as the character evolved.

As an example, my original characters didn’t even have names to begin with, let alone backgrounds. It was “Wiz the elf”, “Muscles the fighter”, and “that go##amn dwarf,” who later became Orion, Eradan, and Yilderim. The characters evolved through their actions and experiences during adventures as part of the game, not from a story invented beforehand.

Developing a story beforehand matters significantly because of how D&D is structured. Character differentiation of powers comes later; the higher the character, the more unique they become. But to start, they’re somewhat generically similar, unless you develop a story for them.

This can certainly affect a group’s enjoyment of the game; there’s nothing more frustrating than creating an elaborate backstory for a character only to have them die an ignominious death early on. Story games like Cortex support character development right from the start; D&D evolves character stories through progression. Thanks to Xanathar’s, now players can flesh them out without advancement … but the game’s may still be deadly enough that any character can die if they’re unlucky.

Your Turn: Does your game support elaborate backstories?

log in or register to remove this ad

Lewis Pulsipher

Lewis Pulsipher

Dragon, White Dwarf, Fiend Folio

log in or register to remove this ad

Flexor the Mighty!

18/100 Strength!
We mostly play beer, whiskey, and pretzels campaigns that are less about detailed backgrounds tying into overarching plots. Story is created during play and will have an effect but really my guys make up blank slates and I've never really gone into a character with a story in mind, usually I don't even know what I'm going to play until I roll the stats. These are L1 D&D chumlies and their lifespans are short, too much effort into a background is often time wasted.


That someone better
In a 1e campaign I ran a few years ago a player wrote three pages of backstory. He died the third session. His next character had a lot less.

Well done sir. I salute you!

I used to hate backstories when I was younger. These days, I recognize that a backstory is all about the value it adds to the game. Does it give the DM plot hooks to use to get the PC invested in the campaign or is it just bad fanfic the player wrote about how awesome their character was before they even got to adventuring?

From a player perspective, I prefer my backstories to be succinct, a few evocative sentences. "For the many decades of his life, Rel the Last lived uneventfully in his tribe, following the tried and true ways, until his family was killed. Now he seeks a glorious death in battle against a worthy foe." "Akretos Noone's last name is fake. He was a promising thief in Unther, but got greedy and stole from the guildmaster, had one of his horns cut off in punishment, and fled. He's been running ever since."


Ideally Back stories should fit on a 3x5 card. Preferably with bullet points.

If more is required due to playing an RPG with a more intertwined political bent Half a page, or double spaced page is acceptable.

Bullet points preferable!

Just a hard No on the fanfic though. Give me what is relevant for play at the table.

For myself, and what I recommend to others, there are three things a backstory should do:

1. Explain how the pc got their abilities, and ideally how they feel about them. This is mostly for continuity.
2. Explain why/how they became adventurers. Adventurer here means 'someone who goes on adventures' - not necessarily someone who wants to or chose to, but they do.
3. Some people or groups of people they knew in the past, so the dm can use that later. Hooks, really. There's no minimum here, and very little detail is needed, but some sort of hooks is good. If you didn't know anyone, how that got to be true is a hook by itself.

You can do bullet points, although some nice prose is nice.

I've only had issues when the explanation of how they got their abilities doesn't match the actual abilities they have, but that's usually from new players who haven't grokked the scope of a level 1 pc in whatever edition. It comes with time.


Relaxed Intensity
I do not like hard and fast rules here, but generally speaking for adventure gaming I think the focus should be mostly on the adventures. There are other sorts of roleplaying games (that are not necessarily "story games") including games like RuneQuest, Traveller, or Exalted where the characters' lives are the adventures and more focus should be on their situation. I'm not really a fan of backstory as like a thing. If it's worth telling it should be relevant to actual play.


Dirty, realism-hating munchkin powergamer
I actually prefer more shared backstory development, as opposed to solo backstory. Like how Beyond the Wall does it with their playbooks. Our in our last session, the whole session was fleshing out our backstory for our level 0 characters and how those characters know each other and how they connect to people in their starting town.


Tension, apprension, and dissension have begun
I mentioned what I want from players who want to give me a backstory. As a player, my first instinct is to write what I would want as a GM. I'd probably write that, regardless, and condense it as much as needed to suit a GM's preferences.


I don't require backstories from my players, but I do point out to them that thinking about who the character is and what the character wants is a good way to inspire in them some of the personality quirks they decide to play. Coming up with the BIFTs for the character can also spur on ideas for how they want to play it. As my groups are of the theatrical type, figuring out wants and needs are kind of ingrained in us, and thus connecting them to events in their past help ground them.

If a player decides to play their character as greedy... a backstory can help determine what they are greedy for (since it doesn't necessarily have to mean gold). And when you connect that to the background and class they've chosen, it can redirect ideas into new directions they might not have initially thought of. Having done improv for several decades has shown me that asking the audience for their second idea of a scene suggestion invariably results in something more creative, more original, and more interesting than whatever their first impulse idea to shout out was. And requesting a PC backstory likewise results in the player taking the time to go through several choices and thus finding the most interesting and more inspiring one.

The time I'm thinking of was when I was starting up my first campaign after a few years away. The players knew that the premise was that they were fighting against an evil magic-user tyrant (inspired by King Claudius from Hamlet). So the one player turns in a two-page backstory. I start reading it and there's stuff about a lover slain by the evil king's forces, and that part was great. But then it went into this in-depth story centering the PC in the rebellion as one of the main protagonists, having performed feats far beyond a 1st level halfling fighter/thief.

I was placed in the position as a DM that I couldn't use the good without validating the bad stuff in that backstory, so I ignored it. In hindsight I should've talked to the player about it, but I was still a young DM of around 19 or 20 at the time.

Just a hard No on the fanfic though. Give me what is relevant for play at the table.

Remove ads

Remove ads