InVinoVeritas
Adventurer
brehobit said:I think we are having an English-English vs American-English problem here.
I think on the other side of the pond "Scoundrel" is a much stronger, and more negative word. Think of "hoodlum" or "cad" but somewhat stronger.
For this American, my issue is that "Complete Scoundrel" is a cliche. It's a phrase I've heard enough times that it... just made me laugh to hear it. I rarely hear the word "scoundrel" without the word "complete" in front of it.
Admittedly, another "other side of the pond" issue is that you probably could call an American any of these things (cad, bounder, scoundrel, ruffian, etc.) and he'd take it as a compliment. Does it mean "disreputable person, to the point of being dishonest and possibly violent"? Absolutely. But being able to outsmart and outstrike the competition are valued in American culture, at least at some level. So, being a scoundrel is cool. Thug? No, not cool, thugs are stupid. Hoodlums tend not to have personal identities, so they aren't liked, either. But a scoundrel, now that's something to aspire to.
The book I don't want to see? Complete Loser.