WotC News - Is this for real???

brehobit said:
I think we are having an English-English vs American-English problem here.

I think on the other side of the pond "Scoundrel" is a much stronger, and more negative word. Think of "hoodlum" or "cad" but somewhat stronger.

For this American, my issue is that "Complete Scoundrel" is a cliche. It's a phrase I've heard enough times that it... just made me laugh to hear it. I rarely hear the word "scoundrel" without the word "complete" in front of it.

Admittedly, another "other side of the pond" issue is that you probably could call an American any of these things (cad, bounder, scoundrel, ruffian, etc.) and he'd take it as a compliment. Does it mean "disreputable person, to the point of being dishonest and possibly violent"? Absolutely. But being able to outsmart and outstrike the competition are valued in American culture, at least at some level. So, being a scoundrel is cool. Thug? No, not cool, thugs are stupid. Hoodlums tend not to have personal identities, so they aren't liked, either. But a scoundrel, now that's something to aspire to.

The book I don't want to see? Complete Loser.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

InVinoVeritas said:
The book I don't want to see? Complete Loser.
Oh, great.

And here I am, finishing the index to "Complete, Dungeons & Dragons-Playing, Anime-Collecting, Scared of Girls, Slight-of-Physique, Pale-Skinned Geek Loser."

Thanks for killing my market, man.
 

Hairfoot said:
Oh, great.

And here I am, finishing the index to "Complete, Dungeons & Dragons-Playing, Anime-Collecting, Scared of Girls, Slight-of-Physique, Pale-Skinned Geek Loser."

Thanks for killing my market, man.
Sweet!

How much XP do I get for the market? :cool:
 


Catavarie said:
what about " Complete Rapscalian" or "Complete Scallywag"

"Complete Raconteur"
"Complete Scamp"
"Complete Rascal"
"Complete Scapegrace"
"Complete Knave"
"Complete Varlet"
"Comlete Charlatan"
"Complete Conniver"
"Complete Miscreant"
"Complete Saboteur"
 


InVinoVeritas said:
For this American, my issue is that "Complete Scoundrel" is a cliche. It's a phrase I've heard enough times that it... just made me laugh to hear it. I rarely hear the word "scoundrel" without the word "complete" in front of it.

Admittedly, another "other side of the pond" issue is that you probably could call an American any of these things (cad, bounder, scoundrel, ruffian, etc.) and he'd take it as a compliment. Does it mean "disreputable person, to the point of being dishonest and possibly violent"? Absolutely. But being able to outsmart and outstrike the competition are valued in American culture, at least at some level. So, being a scoundrel is cool. Thug? No, not cool, thugs are stupid. Hoodlums tend not to have personal identities, so they aren't liked, either. But a scoundrel, now that's something to aspire to.

The book I don't want to see? Complete Loser.

Dude, that reminds me of something. You know those ubiquitous placemats at the chinese restaraunts? The red/gold ones that show the chinese astrological signs?

At the top, they say something like "Witty, brave, gallant, wise, recognize yourself? Spiteful, stingy, cunning, must be somebody else." I never understood the implication that cunning was a bad thing... I still don't. Cunning seems like a totally desirable quality to me.
 

Ghendar said:
Quite true.
However, not sure we need this particular content, imo.

Be sure to keep your "we" to yourself.

As for me, I will judge the book when I'm down at the FLGS thumbing through it.
 


Dragonbait said:
Clearly, WoTC does. "Books with Dragon in the title sell well, and books with the word Magic in the title sell well. Dragon Magic should sell really, really well. Make a book about it."

It would be interesting to har whether or not it worked, as in my humble opinion, Dragon Magic looks to be one of the least intriguing books that WotC has put out.
 

Remove ads

Top