WotC: 'We made a mistake when we said an image not AI'

It seems like AI art is going to be a recurring news theme this year. While this is Magic: the Gathering news rather than D&D or TTRPG news, WotC and AI art has been a hot topic a few times recently. When MtG community members observed that a promotional image looked like it was made with AI, WotC denied that was the case, saying in a now-deleted tweet "We understand confusion by fans given...

Screenshot 2024-01-07 at 18.38.32.png

It seems like AI art is going to be a recurring news theme this year. While this is Magic: the Gathering news rather than D&D or TTRPG news, WotC and AI art has been a hot topic a few times recently.

When MtG community members observed that a promotional image looked like it was made with AI, WotC denied that was the case, saying in a now-deleted tweet "We understand confusion by fans given the style being different than card art, but we stand by our previous statement. This art was created by humans and not AI."

However, they have just reversed their position and admitted that the art was, indeed, made with the help of AI tools.

Well, we made a mistake earlier when we said that a marketing image we posted was not created using AI. Read on for more.

As you, our diligent community pointed out, it looks like some AI components that are now popping up in industry standard tools like Photoshop crept into our marketing creative, even if a human did the work to create the overall image.

While the art came from a vendor, it’s on us to make sure that we are living up to our promise to support the amazing human ingenuity that makes Magic great.

We already made clear that we require artists, writers, and creatives contributing to the Magic TCG to refrain from using AI generative tools to create final Magic products.

Now we’re evaluating how we work with vendors on creative beyond our products – like these marketing images – to make sure that we are living up to those values.


This comes shortly after a different controversy when a YouTube accused them (falsely in this case) of using AI on a D&D promotional image, after which WotC reiterated that "We require artists, writers, and creatives contributing to the D&D TTRPG to refrain from using AI generative tools to create final D&D products."

The AI art tool Midjourney is being sued in California right now by three Magic: The Gathering artists who determined that theirs and nearly 6,000 other artists' work had been scraped without permission. That case is ongoing.

Various tools and online platforms are now incorporating AI into their processes. AI options are appearing on stock art sites like Shutterstock, and creative design platforms like Canva are now offering AI. Moreover, tools within applications like Photoshop are starting to draw on AI, with the software intelligently filling spaces where objects are removed and so on. As time goes on, AI is going to creep into more and more of the creative processes used by artists, writers, and video-makers.

Screenshot 2024-01-07 at 19.02.49.png
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

Blue

Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal
I expect that AI tools will be just as much a part of an artist's bag of tricks just as much as digital brushes are right now. We still have to focus on the ethical sourcing of training material, that's probably going to take laws and a big shake-up.
 


Sir Brennen

Legend
I expect that AI tools will be just as much a part of an artist's bag of tricks just as much as digital brushes are right now. We still have to focus on the ethical sourcing of training material, that's probably going to take laws and a big shake-up.
I think lumping everything labeled “AI“ under the same umbrella is going to be problematic. A tool for filling in blank spaces where something was selected and deleted is not the same as generating an entire image in the style of a particular artist. The ai training for the type of tools in the first example likely depend on a completely different method than scraping images off the web.

Maybe. Some sort of certification process might be needed for “ethically trained“ ai.
 


Maybe. Some sort of certification process might be needed for “ethically trained“ ai.

Adobe only trained ethically on artwork they had the license to. There is no way to prove whether they tell the truth, but I don't see any benefit for them to be lying as they indeed have access to a large enough database with their stock images to train a successful model. And filling in the blank is actually harder than just generating a whole image (more chance to screw up), but the tools are identical.

WotC isn't refusing to buy unethically sourced AI images, it is refusing any AI image, which in the future will mean "no Photoshop work, only real images" as many tools of the Photoshop suite will gain from being AI-assisted.
 
Last edited:

Parmandur

Book-Friend
I think lumping everything labeled “AI“ under the same umbrella is going to be problematic. A tool for filling in blank spaces where something was selected and deleted is not the same as generating an entire image in the style of a particular artist. The ai training for the type of tools in the first example likely depend on a completely different method than scraping images off the web.

Maybe. Some sort of certification process might be needed for “ethically trained“ ai.
True, but WotC already provided guidance to their artists that even that was not acceptable, so...
 




Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top