jdrakeh
Front Range Warlock
SSquirrel said:That's right. We should PM him this thread and tell him to come answer us if he has time. Monte too![]()
Or we could stay on topic.
Regardless of who designated what content OGC in Iron Heroes and any WotC books that Mr. Mearls has worked on, the facts remain that Mr. Mearls proposed an OGC wiki and that many publishers rejected the proposal based, not on anything that Mr. Mearls said or did, nor based on who Mr. Mearls worked for, but specifically because they did not want their OGC to be re-used or made available in a form that made re-use easy for other publishers and fans.
Arguing about whether or not it was rude of Mr. Mearls to propose the project is a completely unrelated issue that sidesteps the written record of events and diverts attention away from the real issue, which was that many publishers were playing dirty poker by trying to place demands of non-use on content already desiganted as OGC.
There is a long-running public record of the OGC wiki debate in several message board threads and blog posts. I don't recall (nor can I locate) a single instance of a publisher rejecting the OGC wiki because Mr. Mearls wrote for WotC or other companies that didn't release a great deal of OGC, or because they felt Mr. Mearls to be self-righteous. No, without exception, AFAICT, the publishers who rejected the wiki did so because they wanted to retroactively restrict already open content.