innerdude
Legend
People with too many niggling pet peeves. And I'm not just saying that to stir the pot. If I'm having to spend too much time during or after a session mediating a bunch of nonsense I'll kindly show you the door. Serious issues can arise and I'll likewise take those seriously, but if Jim doesn't like how Ken roleplays his character or if Sam doesn't like how Sally rolls her dice... people are going to find themselves out on their duff. It's a game. We're all here to have fun and taking it all a little too seriously can be a problem in and of itself. Relax or help yourself to someone else's table.
I get what you're saying, which is why in one of my follow up posts I mentioned that "comedy characters" aren't really a deal-breaker. When I see a "comedy character" hit the table, I don't storm off in a huff and refuse to play. But I do roll my eyes, sigh massively, and think to myself, "Maybe someday . . . maybe . . . I'll get to play a game where one of these doesn't show up." Hasn't happened yet*, though. LOL.
And it's just . . . so . . . predictable. Every single game, there's someone who thinks their newest "punny" character is this amazing contribution to comedy, and that it's never been done before, and oh look, just how clever am I? Isn't this character going to be GREAT??!
*For my next campaign, which will assuredly be Lord of the Rings, it will be an ABSOLUTE requirement for all characters to be done seriously. There WILL be a lengthy "Session Zero" conversation about how I will flat out reject any comedy characters, and I WILL expect players to actually play their characters as if they have a connection to the game world, and if they don't like the idea, they're welcome to see themselves out the door or find someone else to GM. And I don't even care if it makes me seem like a jerk.
