FitzTheRuke
Legend
There are some strange loopholes that I almost feel like Crawford is trying to Punk people who don't take the fiction seriously before they take the rules seriously, as opposed to the other-way-around.What rules issues? I've been playing with the UA for over a year. We haven't had one rules issue. I see threads on this forum with people arguing about the D&D equivalent of angels on the heads of pins, but in actual play, not a problem.
None of it is much of a problem when everyone is playing in good faith, which is, as you say "actual play" - but it's pretty strange for an update that is somewhat more rules-tight than 5e to have some glaring holes.
Make no mistake: There will be errata.
I don't personally think that it's a reason to not-buy, as the errata will be simple "common sense" rulings that you can easily do at the table, but I can understand why some folks might feel that way.