Bump2daWiza
First Post
He has a point. It is not like Morrus went to the Wizos site and posted these comments. Tao is the one stirring things up on a rival company's site.
I agree with Tao.
It's why that old saying "You catch more flies with honey then vinegar" exists.
If someone approaches me with "You idiot, this is how you do X" I will be much less receptive then if someone approaches me with: "hey, you might want to consider making these changes, and here is why-"
Constructive criticism.
Also as a rep of a business, I agree, you do need to make sure your statements are as professional as possible. Even if you're off the clock so to speak. I work for a health insurance company. We have pleanty of competition. I would never make a public statement calling them names. That makes my company look bad. (some companies even regulate what their employees can say in their personal blogs and such about their own comopany or competition.)
This site isn't WOTC and I would hate for WOTC employees to get to dictate the terms of conversation here. Sometimes the truth hurts, but making up reasons to lash out against the message-bearer won't win you any points.
I love this fanboy stuff.
I knew it was coming the moment certain people saw this thread. Scribble, get real. Everything Tao has said is just as unpleasant as anything Morrus has said, it's just a different kind of unpleasantness, a smug condescending, superior kind of unpleasantness, instead of "You suck dude" kind of deal. I don't feel there's anything constructive about that.
As a person who's worked Customer service a lot in the past, a caller who opens with: "Can't you idiots do anything right?" is going to get a lot less of my attention then a caller who opens in a friendly manner.
He's an administrator, but he's not using his "administrator voice" -- over here, mods are allowed to participate as regular people.Nope, but I've also been careful to preface my statements with "in my opinion" and "I can't speak for the rest of the company". I don't have any kind of special designation that labels me as a representative of WotC on this board. Morris is, however, clearly labeled as a representative of ENWorld.
I have no ability to affect WotC's policy, nor do I have power over their boards. I'm here to learn from people who know what's going on -- and you seem to be trying to shut one of them up. I'm against shutting people up when they're giving me useful or interesting information.You seem to be making it fairly clear that you don't have any interest in contributing to any kind of solution. You seem more anxious to shoot the messenger than to take anything beneficial out of what I might be saying. If that is not the case, then I apologize.
Wow, if that is the case, they really fail to understand what bad service and word of mouth about that service can do to dampen enthusiasm. I honestly was ready to buy a year's worth of DDI when I first got my 4e books. Now? Not so sure.No, but in light of these issues they seem to be more than willing to throw the forums under the bus to get there. DDI & Gleemax != the forums. One of the reasons that WotC has openly given for the recent issues is the fact that resources were pulled to work on DDI/Gleemax/Magic Online.
If the boards are up, go search for my threads there.It seems as though we may actually agree on something. Maybe. I'm not entirely certain as to whether or not you are being sarcastic.![]()
That is a very bad way to do customer service. It is human nature, but there is a good chance the person who feels that way has a legit complaint. Not only that, but angry customers tell others about their experience. If anything, give the angry guy more attention.
Sure. But human nature is human nature. People respond better to not being yelled at and called a moron. Which seems to be what Tao is really saying.
If I'm working a call line, and someone opens with "you guys are idiots..." usually first I have tos pend time calming them down, and getting to what the actual problem is.
If they don't ever get aroud to what the problem is, it normally goes into a que with: "This guy has problems with his claims not paying correctly."
As opposed to someone who rationally gives me information that I can use to either: fix the problem right then and there, or pass on to the people who can fix it with enough info for them to know what to fix in the first place.