Cwheeler
First Post
So how do I do my wizard based disarms.. for instance I want a spell where the wizard heated the enemies weapon. And its better in a blast and either they take a point of damage or they drop it. To heck with fighter disarms ;-) me wizard wants it.
Or the one where the cleric commands peace as dominate/charm effect.
Can the cleric do his as an at-will? (sorry I pretty much concluded encounter or daily was required but I think my sarcastic streak is bigger than it used to be.)
I wrote this up, but my hard drive crashed.
It went something like:
Disarm:
At-Will *
Standard Action
Target: One creature
Attack: Strength -4 vs. Fort OR Dexterity -4 vs. Reflex. (martial) Int -4 vs Reflex OR Cha -4 vs Will (Magical)
Hit: The target drops its weapon in its square. Any creature may pick up the weapon, but doing so provokes an opportunity attack. The disarmed creature may make attacks as if they where wielding the weapon, but can no longer apply special weapon properties and powers that the weapon previously granted. The character is also weakened. These changes end immediately when the character arms themselves with a new weapon or implement.
Special: When disarming opponents more than 1 size larger or smaller than you, you take a -2 penalty to the attack roll. This increases by -2 with each size category of difference beyond the second.
Special: You may only use this power when you have combat advantage against an opponent.
This could be modified by feats:
Divine Persuasion:
You may expend your Channel Divinity encounter power to use a disarm attempt as if you had combat advantage.
Other feats could be created for other power sources.
I agree with much of the sentiment that disarm is a bit too wonky to allow for my tastes, but if you do go with making it into a power I would do this: Require a feat to learn the move, and make "Requires combat advantage" as part of the power.
That way at least the player would have to make use of some strategy to make use of the power, and it should fit the simulationist notion of the creature "leaving enough of an opening to allow itself to be disarmed."
That makes SO much sense! Why didn't this come up before?