Hello folks,
A player in my game is playing a rogue. At his level, he is entitled to several missile attacks and one of his tactics, if circumstances allow, is to (from cover) stand up from prone (a free action for his rogue), fire his arrows, then drop "prone" again (also a free action).
We are having a debate, about this, amongst our group and some (including me) are curious if this tactic is actually "legal". Standing up from cover is normally a move-action, whereas if the rogue intends to fire off all of his arrows (a full round attack), he can only take a 5' step as his movement.
The player of the rogue states (correctly) that standing up from prone is a free action for his rogue (special ability) and dropping to prone is also a free action so he isnt, therefore, violating the "5' step only" rule.
I suppose my point is that even though the stand up from prone is a free-action for a rogue, would it count as "movement" during the full attack action?
A player in my game is playing a rogue. At his level, he is entitled to several missile attacks and one of his tactics, if circumstances allow, is to (from cover) stand up from prone (a free action for his rogue), fire his arrows, then drop "prone" again (also a free action).
We are having a debate, about this, amongst our group and some (including me) are curious if this tactic is actually "legal". Standing up from cover is normally a move-action, whereas if the rogue intends to fire off all of his arrows (a full round attack), he can only take a 5' step as his movement.
The player of the rogue states (correctly) that standing up from prone is a free action for his rogue (special ability) and dropping to prone is also a free action so he isnt, therefore, violating the "5' step only" rule.
I suppose my point is that even though the stand up from prone is a free-action for a rogue, would it count as "movement" during the full attack action?