I'd say almost the reverse, that traditionally kings were heavily in debt to bankers and whoever could lend them money (like rich nobles or foreign kings).
Wars cost tremendous amounts of money that has to come from somewhere, and often fast.
Henry VIII was famously bankrupt, which probably made it more tempting to reform the Church to get their taxes, for instance. (Which also, incidentally goes for the contemporary Swedish king Gustav Vasa. A surprising amount of the reformations were at least partially induced by monetary concerns, which, come to think of it, isn't surprising at all.)
So lending the king money so he can wage his wars is a good way to spend it - not that many have that sort of ready cash.
And when he's heavily in debt you can always try to manoeuvre into his seat instead.
And then you build the enormous tomb filled with traps and guardians to protect your money and treasures.
You have to leave something for the next generation, after all.