D&D 5E 5E AD&D Restricitons

Sure it was arbitrary, but it wasn't a big deal. It comes into play only very rarely.

And because curry is gooooooood, and getting bladdered is manly and macho, and 70s/80s heroes were all manly and macho too. With big moustaches, and V8s, or Ferraris, and tough names - like Magnum.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


We're using it in a brand new 1E campaign... I've got a group of relatively new RPers who started with 5E, and we're running an episodic old school 1E campaign using some of the published 1E modules. 1 session in and it has had a massive thumbs-up so far - they love the feeling of freedom and extra improvisation that comes with having a lack of predefined skills. 1 guy rolled obscenely good stats so he is playing a Monk who only fights with a Lasso and his fists.

But we only apply the racial/gender based stat limits to initial rolls modified by racial adjustments. We adjusted for age afterwards, and I would allow age modifiers to take them above/below the stated PHB maximums/minimums.
 


Well, a table can play how they want. So long as it doesn't come up, no one should care.

However, I'd note that if someone wanted to play a Red Sonja character, and rolled a natural 18, it would seem ... odd to have her required to limit herself. Racial limits on abilities are slightly different; one can argue that they are required for game balance reasons (I'm not saying that this is correct, or not correct, and Gygax was notoriously human-centric) - but the gender limitations doesn't have a meaningful in-game "balance," (in other words, there are no corresponding advantages to playing a female character, or disadvantages to playing a male character). To the extent that it is justified by realism, well, dragons can fly, armor re-sizes itself, and everyone (with one exception!) ignores the weapon v. AC tables. :)

Anyway, given my decades of playing 1e, and given Gygax's occasional less-than-enlightened comments on gender (he was a product of his times), I think that this a rule best consigned to the dustbin of history. YMMV.

Why does this always come up? Female characters did not have a strength penalty. They did have a hard limit on their score...18/50 to be exact, which got enforced about as often as the 18/75 strength limit for male elves, or the 18/99 limit for dwarves and half-orcs.

Which is, by the way, pretty much never.
 


However, I'd note that if someone wanted to play a Red Sonja character, and rolled a natural 18

You *could* play Red Sonja, and these were her stats:

Red Sonja
Fighter:11
Strength:14
Intelligence:17
Wisdom:10
Dexterity:17
Constitution:11
Charisma:18
Hit Points:75
 


Then Magical/Deity intervention trumps Gygax's limits.... (as it always could - Halflings for example were limited to 17 strength, but level progression was allowed to fighter level 6 for those able to achieve 18 'somehow' - ie through magical/divine means)


Edit - but the intro to RS1 states that the AD&D module featuring Red Sonja is based on the Marvel incarnation.... so those are her stats!
 


Remove ads

Top