D&D Movie/TV Chris Pine To Star In D&D Movie

The long, slow process towards a modern take on D&D movies took a large step forward with the announcement of a huge star signed to the project. Considering that filming is set to start soon a cascade of announcements should be revealed in initiative order imminently. Filming begins in Q1 2021. Jonathan Goldstein and John Francis Daley will be directing the film which features "an ensemble...

The long, slow process towards a modern take on D&D movies took a large step forward with the announcement of a huge star signed to the project. Considering that filming is set to start soon a cascade of announcements should be revealed in initiative order imminently. Filming begins in Q1 2021.

Jonathan Goldstein and John Francis Daley will be directing the film which features "an ensemble cast and take a subversive approach to the game."

chris-pine-variety-studio.jpg


Chris Pine has closed a deal to star in Dungeons & Dragons, the live action film based on Hasbro’s massively popular role-playing game from Wizards of the Coast. Hasbro/eOne and Paramount are jointly producing and financing, with eOne distributing in the UK and Canada, and Paramount the rest of the world.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad


Could he be Wulfgar or Artemis?
I would say not.

He isn't sufficiently craggy and weather-beaten to play a barbarian or ranger. (he is too old to be Wulfgar anyway).

He isn't sufficiently wiry, dark and gravel-voiced to play an assassin.

He is too physical and not old/young enough to be a wizard.

He is too square-jawed to be an elf and too tall to be a dwarf, gnome or halfling (they could get round that with FX, but it seems like unnecessary expense to me).

I would cast him as a human paladin or leader-type fighter. Original character, original story.
 


Ravenbrook

Explorer
What's new about taking a subversive approach to D&D? In a sense, the game has always been subverting itself. Besides that, I think it would make more sense to produce a D&D series than a feature film.
 


TheSword

Legend
lol no.

The idea that audiences don't want to see stories where good triumphs over evil is just ridiculous.

The first dnd movie didn't bomb because it was "straight", it bombed because it was poorly made and half of it didn't make any sense.
I agree, just like those famous bombs, Lord of the Rings and the Avengers.
Lord of the rings has been done though. The film has been made. A D&D movie that tries to be a replication of of Lord of the Rings will bomb. It’s been done. Lord of the Rings invented the cliches, it has originality because it was the first fantasy film of that scale with that cast of that quality. It had never been done before. Im sorry to say a D&D film ain’t gonna be the next LotR no matter how hard they try, if they play it straight down the line.

My point is that a film about 4-6 adventures that meet in spurious circumstances and quest or defeat the BBEG is not sophisticated enough for a modern audience in a fantasy world. Avengers had a ready made cast of characters already known and liked from their existing films - and this style easily backfires (Justice League)

It has to thread a very fine line between being recognizably d&d otherwise what’s the point, and cliched in which case it will be cringeworthy. The best way to do this in my opinion is with humour and some kind of conceit that allows the story to be told in a new way.

I’ll let you into a secret. I love fantasy as a genre but there’s a reason not many fantasy films like LOTR get made. They cost a lot of money, can easily cross the line into being silly, they require the audiences to make huge suspensions of disbelief, have large amounts of jargon that make total and utter sense to a fan and are completely irrelevant and confusing to everyone else.

I’ll let you into another secret. Generally fantasy writing isn’t very good. It tends not to win awards or receive literary approval (unless awarded by the community itself) and the fans are fairy rabid who are easily pleased as long as the books conform to certain expectations. They tend to be pretty similar and again tend to be bought by a pretty specific group of individuals.

Not a great combination.

You can claim you want the next Lord of the Rings but I think you’re asking to be disappointed.
 
Last edited:

We have to remember the main target isn't the D&D fandom but to conquer the people who doesn't know yet D&D. I guess it will be something like a epic adventure with a light touch of comedy, not too violent, for parents who go with their children to the cinema.

If after the movie the sales of D&D toys and other products start to shoot ups then it has been a success even when the boxoffice says isn't enough.

If a (cute) Grogu/baby Yoda blue (gobling subrace with psionic powers) babe appears you can bet lots of players will want a blue goblin as PC.
 


rgoodbb

Adventurer
As long as it isn't a rapier. Unless, of course, it is a D&D remake of The Princess Bride. Is that subversive enough?
Definitely needs a rapier...that breaks in the first battle.
Definitely needs a Drow …that falls to friendly fire in the first battle.
Definitely needs a 4elements monk...that dies of exhaustion after 12 second burst of elements
Definitely needs a cowardly Cavalier hiding behind a big round shield as the Lead...Chris Pine?
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top