I was thinking more of the perceptions of those who have been a consistent thorn in the side of anti-Covid efforts thus far. You know, the Dunning-Kreuger clique.Yeah, but it doesn't seem to have managed the goal.
The problem in this instance being, as has already been noted, that an impartial process, when imposed upon an inequitable starting situation, has predictably inequitable results.
Since that result is predictable, that means the plan ISN'T actually impartial. The inequitable result is chosen implicitly, which is not impartial at all.
Even if the plan has predictable inequities, it still may be more effective than a fairer plan if it gets the nonconformists to conform.
Last edited: