D&D (2024) bring back the pig faced orcs for 6th edition, change up hobgoblins & is there a history of the design change

Status
Not open for further replies.

Faolyn

(she/her)
I'm not sure that is entirely supported. Zariel is listed as a fiend, but was created as a celestial. If it is possible for a celestial to fall and become a fiend, it implies it is also possible for a fiend to rise and become a celestial.

Not 5e, but there is also the character Fall-From-Grace in Planescape: Torment, a lawful neutral succubus.
Zariel, IIRC, was corrupted from what was likely thousands of year's worth of evil emanations from her time fighting in Hell (i.e., not a lot of free will involved here), and from what I can tell, Fall-From-Grace suffered thousands of years of torture by devils, which probably had something to do with her change of mind.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Zariel, IIRC, was corrupted from what was likely thousands of year's worth of evil emanations from her time fighting in Hell (i.e., not a lot of free will involved here), and from what I can tell, Fall-From-Grace suffered thousands of years of torture by devils, which probably had something to do with her change of mind.
Whatever the reasons, I would say there is no one, not even fiends, who it is okay to kill just because they is evil.
 


S'mon

Legend
If a creature is evil in D&Dland, it's likely actively being evil. Or if not that, it's likely enabling evil in others.

What if a bunch of evil creatures are sitting around being evil to each other, nowhere near any neutral or good creatures? OK to kill them & take their stuff?
 

Faolyn

(she/her)
What if a bunch of evil creatures are sitting around being evil to each other, nowhere near any neutral or good creatures? OK to kill them & take their stuff?
If it's not an OK thing to do to a good or neutral creature, it's not an OK thing to do to an evil person either. Kind of why prison rape jokes aren't cool.
 

Chaosmancer

Legend
My grandfather was a conscript in the Italian army. He didn't believe in what Mussolini was doing but he didn't have a choice.

I'm sorry he went through that.

However, there is a flip side to that as well. There are true believers to these causes. Even today, there are neo-nazi's and they had full choice in what they are doing. And that is what we are talking about with the uniform situation.

And, personally, I find it far easier to logically parse out "true believer to the cause" and "person with no choice in an impossible situation" than I do with "born evil" races and "sometimes they aren't". It could be said to be a sideways step in representation, but it is one that I find makes the forking paths much much easier to understand and shorthand.
 

Sithlord

Adventurer
Maybe everyone in the fictional made up not real race that is an allegory for storytelling chose evil in a fantasy world that is not real because we are using them for allegory and not species like in Star Trek.
 


Mind of tempest

(he/him)advocate for 5e psionics
There's entire generations of players who have grown up knowing only this. I think abruptly reverting to how thinks were in historical times would be jarring, to put it mildly.
I am more an orsimer man my self but yeah orc have more or less become people in most settings, we can't really reset that.
 

Maybe everyone in the fictional made up not real race that is an allegory for storytelling chose evil in a fantasy world that is not real because we are using them for allegory and not species like in Star Trek.
FWIW, even Star Trek tends to introduce new species as a metaphor for some aspect of humanity. "They're like humans, but more [hat]." The interesting species are the ones we see more of - because one of the ways they are like humans is that they're diverse.

I personally use Star Trek as my model for how races/ancestries in rpgs should be treated. They can have a hat, but they should never be a hat.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top