TSR Who's running the TSR3 social media accounts?

Ernie Gygax (before he and Stephen Dinehart accused the whole affair of being orchestrated by WotC and then deleted their Twitter accounts) indicated that Justin LaNasa was running the social media accounts for TSR3, Giantlands, and Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum.

After a full week of insults, barbed exchanges, and problematic statements from all three accounts, the following has been posted by somebody who identified themselves as "Michael", perhaps suggesting that Justin LaNasa is no longer with the company (which seems unlikely), leaving many on social media to question whether "Michael" exists. The new TSR3 was founded by LaNasa, Stephen Dinehart, and Ernie Gygax, and despite the acrinomious social media activity, the former two founders' names have largely escaped much of the criticism.

UPDATE -- the below tweets now appear to have been deleted.

Screen Shot 2021-07-02 at 7.30.39 PM.png

Around the same time, the header above the available events at the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum website was altered to read: "Most role playing games will be played in old school fashion so if you're easliy offended or Rude ! DO NOT PLAY !" (sic)

tsr_rude.png

So who is TSR3 co-founder Justin LaNasa? He was an American politician who ran for office in 2014 and 2020, and who was involved in a minor scandal during the latter campaign.

 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad







poitics and religeon are two subjects never to be discused here, frome either perspective. thems da rules here folks.
Actually it's more complicated than that.

Technically speaking all of this discussion is regarding a political nature because this surrounding controversy is pulling inspiration from contemporary culture war topics. And as evidenced in this thread and the last few ones, the mods are okay with political discussion, given that none of these threads are getting locked.

I think that ENWorld's Terms of service on "no religion or politics" is a bit too vague, but unless I'm mistaken Morrus and other mods are working on revising it. Heck, the emphasis on inclusivity is seen in a lot of circles as inherently "political," sad as that is to say.
 

The person wasn't asking a question; the person in question was making a demand that the company recite a pledge toward a particular moral stance. That is disgusting.

That's some stretch you made there.

Edit: I would also argue that a pledge of "trans men are men and trans women are women" is a religious stance, but that is an argument for another time and place.
You would also be wrong.
 

Edit: I would also argue that a pledge of "trans men are men and trans women are women" is a religious stance, but that is an argument for another time and place.

Are you saying that because the reverse is the religious stance of some people? That's not how it works.

To use a simplistic but clear (and made-up) example, just because some religion proclaims that the sky is yellow doesn't make the color of the sky a religious or moral issue.
 

Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top