Maxperson
Morkus from Orkus
This doesn't matter, though. With the teeth pulled out of alignment via the loss of alignment mechanics, it doesn't matter who agrees on what. If I have a CG Ranger and I'm playing what I feel CG is and the DM disagrees, he can pound sand. There's literally nothing he can do about it unless he changes the rules, which removes anything after that from being the fault of alignment and places the fault entirely on the DM's shoulders.I would go even further. I get that people that have no use for alignment have alignment horror stories, but even people who seem to like alignment can’t seem to agree on how it applies. (The last thread had a big disagrement between proponents as to whether Original Trilogy Darth Vader was LE or CE).
The vast majority of disagreements from people on my side of things are cosmetic. They are small differentiations in interpretation of individual acts. Even major ones, though, aren't really relevant. As long as we're running alignments consistently and not using it as a straightjacket/beat stick, it's all good.To me, it undercuts the argument that horror stories are the consequence of playing alignment wrong, when even those who play it “right” disagree.