• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

D&D 5E The October D&D Book is Fizban’s Treasury of Dragons

As revealed by Nerd Immersion by deciphering computer code from D&D Beyond!

Fizban the Fabulous is, of course, the accident-prone, befuddled alter-ego of Dragonlance’s god of good dragons, Paladine, the platinum dragon (Dragonlance’s version of Bahamut).

Which makes my guess earlier this year spot on!

UPDATE -- the book now has a description!



2E56D87C-A6D8-4079-A3B5-132567350A63.png




EEA82AF0-58EA-457E-B1CA-9CD5DCDF4035.jpeg

Fizban the Fabulous by Vera Gentinetta
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Every single conversation online about Dark Sun eventually descends into a conversation about the portrayal of slavery and forced breeding
Why would WizCo want to bring that up and make that the focus of every single news article discussing their forthcoming product? That's begging for negative press

Only because you keep bringing it up... I feel like most gamers are mature enough to deal with the issues of Dark Sun in a respectful way, and if not players can just leave that toxic table.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Eberron would disagree with pulp,
But there are no Nazis
and Thay (a constant enemy in 5E books) are essentially wizard-Nazis. And their country is run on slavery.
In what 5e book do they mention Thay slaves?
(Didn't they do away with those in 4th Ed?)

And there's a HUGE difference between one nation out of thirty that is on he far end of the world using slaves and every single city-state and civilized nation using slaves and most PCs potentially being slaves, former slaves, escaped slaves, or the children of slaves
 

Every single conversation online about Dark Sun eventually descends into a conversation about the portrayal of slavery and forced breeding
Why would WizCo want to bring that up and make that the focus of every single news article discussing their forthcoming product? That's begging for negative press
The only conversations about Dark Sun I’ve ever seen do so are ones where someone insists (contrary to all evidence) that the mere existence of slavery in the setting makes it “too problematic to be revisited” as you are doing here. Nobody actually thinks Dark Sun’s depiction of slavery is problematic, it’s all just unwarranted hand-wringing about “modern sensibilities” hypothetically ruining their precious grimdark setting.
 


What happened to him.
Paladine (Fizban's true, godly form) turned himself and Takhisis into mortals (he had to do it to keep the balance, hers was as punishment). Paladine is now a mortal elf named Valthonis. Takhisis was turned human and promptly killed. Paladine's identity as Fizban has permanently ceased to be. He even has started to forget some of his godly knowledge.
 


Paladine (Fizban's true, godly form) turned himself and Takhisis into mortals (he had to do it to keep the balance, hers was as punishment). Paladine is now a mortal elf named Valthonis. Takhisis was turned human and promptly killed. Paladine's identity as Fizban has permanently ceased to be. He even has started to forget some of his godly knowledge.

Well clearly they will end up undoing that.
 

But there are no Nazis

In what 5e book do they mention Thay slaves?
(Didn't they do away with those in 4th Ed?)

And there's a HUGE difference between one nation out of thirty that is on he far end of the world using slaves and every single city-state and civilized nation using slaves and most PCs potentially being slaves, former slaves, escaped slaves, or the children of slaves
There are, like, 13 flavors of Nazi in Eberron.

I don't doubt that 5E Dark Sun will be different from 2E or even 4E in presentation, but it is not an insurmountable problem.
 


Into the Woods

Related Articles

Remove ads

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top