TSR Did TSR Sue Regularly?

Shannon Appelcline (Designers & Dragons) talks about it here! With infographics!

"Every company interacts with the rest of the industry in a different way. For Chaosium it's been more than 40 years of licensing, while Target Games created and defined roleplaying in its home country of Sweden. Dave Nalle's Ragnarok Enterprises instead influenced designers and publishers through interactions in A&Eand Abyss. As for TSR, the founder of our industry: as wags have put it: they sue regularly."

Advanced Designers & Dragons #47: TSR Connections: Licenses & Lawsuits - RPGnet

They also sued WotC once!

 

[Thomas Shey]

I was going to respond a bit more about Aftermath, but its true that's manifestly off-topic for this thread.

Regarding Trav2300, it also made a genuine attempt to have actually alien aliens; one could question how interesting they are, but its a rare enough attempt its worth commenting on.

 

[AbdulAlhazred]

The glory of 2300 was not character creation nor the gear but the Near Star Map - and the associated Near Star List, complete with IRL astronomical data and 3-D coordinates. An irresistible lure to any amateur stargazer!
It inspired me to buy Star Cruiser, the starship combat game set in 2300's future history.

I bought a couple of Space:1889 sourcebooks, because I liked the milieu and the use of IRL semi-science. Never played the game (or even tried), just let my historian's imagination run wild.

Hehe, I remember using my C64 and some linear algebra fu to write a program which let you input the distance, right ascension, and azimuth of all the nearby (well any really) stars and then printed out projections from different angles, with some sort of notation to crib in the 3rd dimension (I lost all those maps long ago, along with the code, so I don't remember the details). Also, the game Imperium from GDW is a map of the local neighborhood, complete with jump routes (it is set in the Third Imperium timeline). I think they might have fudged a tiny bit, mine looked a bit different.

Anyway, the idea of an 'explore the local area' game is interesting, except it is a bit less exciting when the assumption is "nothing much has been explored." So 2300's changes to the technology were, I think driven to a large extent by the idea of making such a scenario a bit more interesting. Where Traveller's jump tech begs the question of why nobody has just jumped further out (refueling being pretty easy even without facilities for a properly equipped starship). Nowadays there are a good number of programs out there which can do 3D star charts suitable for games, though none of them seems super easy to use...

GDW definitely did publish some fun wargames. I always liked the Sci-Fi ones best. Imperium and Dark Nebula are both pretty good games, as well as being set in the Traveller milieu.

 

[JustAnIdea]

Hehe. Well, they may have s-d the pooch, but they left some good offspring behind, no? I quit in 1976 (but was made job offers in 1980 and 1985 to return) so I take no responsibility for their antics. This article actually surprised me as I learned of some I had not been aware of.

What was your official Job when you created the Beholder? How were you paid for it. Were you work for hire, or a regular employee?

 

[Rob Kuntz]

What was your official Job when you created the Beholder? How were you paid for it. Were you work for hire, or a regular employee?

My brother Terry Kuntz created the Beholder and wasn't paid anything for it. Sorry, wrong "Kuntz".

 

[JustAnIdea]

My brother Terry Kuntz created the Beholder and wasn't paid anything for it. Sorry, wrong "Kuntz".

Thanks for your fast response Rob ( you are a legend by the way... eternal thanks for your part in my childhood) I am really not sure how Terry does not have a co-authorship from a legal standpoint... like far too many Terry did not get paid well enough for his contribution.

 

[Rob Kuntz]

Thanks for your fast response Rob ( you are a legend by the way... eternal thanks for your part in my childhood) I am really not sure how Terry does not have a co-authorship from a legal standpoint... like far too many Terry did not get paid well enough for his contribution.

Well, that's been a, to date, dead issue, yes. But I will not speak for Terry. I have had many ruminations about the matter over the years, covered in part in my ongoing work (coming 'round a bend and racing for the home stretch) Lake Geneva Days.

You're welcome! All my earliest days with the LGTSA and TSR were golden as we pursued a dream for all. I'm glad that you received a slice of it!

 

[Dire Bare]

Thanks for your fast response Rob ( you are a legend by the way... eternal thanks for your part in my childhood) I am really not sure how Terry does not have a co-authorship from a legal standpoint... like far too many Terry did not get paid well enough for his contribution.

Most work on D&D, both back-in-the-day and today, is/was work-for-hire. Which means, you create something for the franchise, get paid for it once and you have no ownership over the element you created.

Is this a fair deal? It's debatable, some folks think it's a terrible way to treat your creatives, others find it a perfectly acceptable way to build a shared-universe franchise. It's a thing in tabletop RPG land, and in comics as well. Big lawsuits in comics-land over characters created that go on to be big deals, but the original creators don't see the financial return the franchise owners do (Superman is a great example).

 

[Rob Kuntz]

Most work on D&D, both back-in-the-day and today, is/was work-for-hire. Which means, you create something for the franchise, get paid for it once and you have no ownership over the element you created.

Is this a fair deal? It's debatable, some folks think it's a terrible way to treat your creatives, others find it a perfectly acceptable way to build a shared-universe franchise. It's a thing in tabletop RPG land, and in comics as well. Big lawsuits in comics-land over characters created that go on to be big deals, but the original creators don't see the financial return the franchise owners do (Superman is a great example).

Correction. Terry was not employed by TSR at the time he showcased his short story about the Beholder, first to me and then to Gary, this as Gary and I were finishing Sup 1 to D&D, Greyhawk (its FC is where the Beholder (drawn by Bell) first appears as an illo).

@ALL: As I've indicated I am not going to get into the matter, any further than I already have, on these boards.

 

[Dire Bare]

Correction. Terry was not employed by TSR at the time he showcased his short story about the Beholder, first to me and then to Gary, this as Gary and I were finishing Sup 1 to D&D, Greyhawk (its FC is where the Beholder (drawn by Bell) first appears as an illo).

@ALL: As I've indicated I am not going to get into the matter, any further than I already have, on these boards.

I get that this is something you aren't super interested in talking about, and that's more than fair. It certainly sounds like something unfair happened during those wild-and-wooly pre-publication days. If I'm reading you right, your brother shared the idea and didn't get credit or payment for it at all . . . which would definitely be super uncool, despite how new everyone was to publishing back then. Especially considering how iconic the beholder has become to D&D.

Sorry to continue the conversation, I certainly don't expect a response. I'm just one of many nerds fascinated by all that went on during the initial creation of D&D . . . both the good and the bad. Seems like there was a lot of both in those early TSR days.

 

[Rob Kuntz]

It certainly sounds like something unfair happened during those wild-and-wooly pre-publication days.

That 'My Good Bear' is the understatement of the year.