MichaelSomething
Legend
How about "Multi classed Fighter/Rouge/Sorcerer?"
How about "Multi classed Fighter/Rouge/Sorcerer?"
The thing is. The 5e Bard derives from Celtic culture. Divination, charm, curse, transmutation, are the kinds of things that a Celtic bard does.When I run bards and druids, I like to keep them tied to Celtic culture.
But the modern fantasy bard archetype — the happy-go-lucky, charming rake who uses both actual magic and sleight-of-hand to pick unwary pockets, and uses music to bolster allies, sooth savage beasts in the vein of Orpheus, and seduce anything with a pulse (or not, if you count undead and constructs)
— doesn't quite fit a more historically grounded bard (or skald or scop).
Really? I remember from The Mists of Avalon Merlin (a title) to be a druid first, a sage second, and a minstrel third. I have an impression 1e (?) Bard was trying to emulate that, with all those levels in fighter, thief, and druid before going bard. I never played 1e, though, that's just an impression from reading the PHB a few times a long time ago.
The class abandoned any druidic roots it might've had starting with 2e (my first edition). They kept its loremaster legacy, though. I suppose if we remove the druidic aspect of the Merlin, the 5E Bard is enough of a loremaster and minstrel to play a Merlin-like character. Good catch.
I'd pick something without a real world tie because any word you pick is going to have the same issue as Bard.
Songmage, Glamourspinner, Enchanter (if that wasn't already overloaded), Charmer, Guitar Hero - none of those sound great though.
I think we're stuck with Bard the same way we're stuck with Druid and with Barbarian.
Songmage...
Spellsinger sounds better IMO, but it also sounds like a completely different class than a bard. Maybe Monte Cook's alternative bard from Book of Eldritch Might II....none of those sound great though.
Part of the problem is "what is a bard in 5e"? The bard is a spellcasting class that can also perform in melee that is a jack of all trades but also is expected to be a performer whose magic is tied to their performance and inspire their colleagues. As a concept it's kind of all over the place, though the core component of "performer of some type" seems to be the element that holds the class together.Spellsinger sounds better IMO, but it also sounds like a completely different class than a bard. Maybe Monte Cook's alternative bard from Book of Eldritch Might II.
"Minstrel" is the term used a half dozen times in the 1957 short story by Poul Anderson which debuts Cappen Varra, the pulp character who most closely resembles the 2E Bard archetype."Trickster" is a bit too generic, I think. But "jester" has at least two really good things going for it: it's close enough in meaning to "minstrel" to convey almost the same idea (but more adventurous-sounding, and without the unfortunate implications attached to the term in the 19th century); and it already has a functional character class which is mechanically very similar to the 2e-style bard archetype that I'm trying to preserve here (first appearing in Dragon #3 and then revised in Dragon #60).
My aim in starting this topic — to perhaps make matters a little clearer — is that I'm designing a class system that will have both a 2e-style "magical thieving street-entertainer" bard (in the vein of the 2e class) and a "druidic warrior-poet" bard (perhaps most directly inspired by the Castles & Crusades version of the class, which is a straight-up warrior-type with d10 hit dice and the full attack bonus, but no thieving or magic at all). While most gamers might be inclined to continue calling the former archetype "bard" and the latter "warlord," I'm not going to do that, because to me, a bard is a very Celtic and warlike archetype. A proper bard class IMO should evoke "The Minstrel Boy" more than Jaskier — but that leaves me needing a name for the Jaskier archetype, and "jester" is pretty damn good for that.![]()